GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (9) TMI 239 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (9) TMI 239 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2016 (45) S.T.R. 526 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Demand of interest - Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 - construction service in respect of commercial or industrial building or civil structures discharge of service tax when demanded as ascertained by himself failure to pay interest on demand SCN for the demand of interest Held that: - provisions of Section 75 would apply even in the case wherein an assessee deposits service tax liability on his own ascertainme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ief granted penalty imposed under section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. - ST/543/2011 - A/89257/16/STB - Dated:- 27-7-2016 - Shri M V Ravindran, Member (Judicial) and Shri C J Mathew, Member (Technical) Shri Nilesh Rathi, Advocate for the appellant Shri A.B. Kulgod, Asstt. Commissioner (AR) for the respondent ORDER This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No: AKP/146/NSK/2011 dated 30/06/2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nasik. 2. Heard both .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

respect of commercial or industrial building or civil structures is taxable under Finance Act 1994. The appellant had during the period 2004-05 to 2008-09 rendered the services to one M/s Gemini Instratech, Ambad, Nasik and received payment for the services rendered. On being pointed out, appellant on their own ascertainment or as ascertained by the department discharged the entire service tax liability by challans dated 12th March 2008 and 18th March 2010. Neither the appellant nor the departm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rst appellate authority upheld the order-in-original but modified the penalty imposed under Section 76 to ₹ 100/-per day during which the failure to pay service tax continued. 5. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that issue of show cause notice has been wrong as the period of limitation also applies for the demand of interest. It is his submission that the amount of tax liability was deposited at the instance of the department and no formal order of the con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version