Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (9) TMI 239 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (9) TMI 239 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Demand of interest - Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 - construction service in respect of commercial or industrial building or civil structures discharge of service tax when demanded as ascertained by himself failure to pay interest on demand SCN for the demand of interest Held that: - provisions of Section 75 would apply even in the case wherein an assessee deposits service tax liability on his own ascertainment and there is no need to issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. - ST/543/2011 - A/89257/16/STB - Dated:- 27-7-2016 - Shri M V Ravindran, Member (Judicial) and Shri C J Mathew, Member (Technical) Shri Nilesh Rathi, Advocate for the appellant Shri A.B. Kulgod, Asstt. Commissioner (AR) for the respondent ORDER This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No: AKP/146/NSK/2011 dated 30/06/2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nasik. 2. Heard both the sides and perused the record .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ial building or civil structures is taxable under Finance Act 1994. The appellant had during the period 2004-05 to 2008-09 rendered the services to one M/s Gemini Instratech, Ambad, Nasik and received payment for the services rendered. On being pointed out, appellant on their own ascertainment or as ascertained by the department discharged the entire service tax liability by challans dated 12th March 2008 and 18th March 2010. Neither the appellant nor the department raised any issue regarding co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e order-in-original but modified the penalty imposed under Section 76 to ₹ 100/-per day during which the failure to pay service tax continued. 5. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that issue of show cause notice has been wrong as the period of limitation also applies for the demand of interest. It is his submission that the amount of tax liability was deposited at the instance of the department and no formal order of the confirmation was made. It is his fur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version