Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sage Publications Ltd. U.K. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Int'l Taxation) Circle-II (2) , N. Delhi

2016 (9) TMI 299 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Rejection of application under Section 245R(2) - advance ruling - Held that:- It is evident on a plain reading of the notice that it does not address itself to any specific question; it does not even disclose application of mind to the returns save and except the fact that they conform to the instructions which compelled the AO to issue a scrutiny notice on account of the international transaction reported by the assessee. The previous authority of this Court in Hyosung (2016 (2) TMI 575 - DELHI .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

now be processed and independently dealt with on its merits in accordance with law by the Ruling Authority. The parties shall be present before the Advance Ruling Authority on 13.09.2016. The writ petition is allowed in the above terms. - W.P.(C) 5870/2016 - Dated:- 29-8-2016 - MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT & MS. DEEPA SHARMA JJ. Petitioner Through: Sh. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. Respondent Through: Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Raghvendra Singh, Jr. Standing Counsel and Sh. Anup .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uthority [hereafter the Ruling Authority ], on 21.11.2013. When the application came up for consideration, the Ruling Authority rejected it citing the reason that the issue was pending - thereby invoking proviso to Article 245R(2). The Ruling Authority s order is as follows: PROCEEDINGS There is a request for adjournment on the ground of unavailability of the counsel. However, the Department takes an objection to this request and points out that in this matter there is already a notice issued un .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t is obvious that all the questions will be covered under the said notice under Section 143(2) including the questions raised before us. In that case, there is a complete bar for entertaining the application under Section 245R(2). In that view, we reject this application under Section 245R(2). 3. Learned counsel relies upon the judgment of this Court in L.S. Cable & System Limited v. CIT [W.P.(C) 8799/2015, decided on 13.05.2016] as well as the previous judgment in Hyosung Corporation v. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed under the scrutiny guidelines applicable under that provision to issue notice to all assesses who had reported income on international transactions exceeding 15 crores. This, it was submitted, was the point of distinction between the previous authorities of the Court. 5. Hyosung (supra) was noticed in the subsequent ruling in L.S. Cable (supra) where it was held as follows: 13. This Court in Hyosung Corporation v. The Authority for Advance Rulings (supra) held that mere issuance of a notice u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

43(2)(ii) of the Act, it is seen that it is in a standard format which merely states that there are certain points in connection with the returns of income on which the AO would like some further information. In any event the question raised in the applications by the Petitioner before the AAR do not appear to be forming the subject matter of the said notice under Section 143(2)(ii) of the Act. Consequently, the mere fact that such a notice was issued prior to the filing of the application by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

245-R (2) should be related to the date of filing of the application and not what happens subsequent to the filing of such application. In other words, it is only if on the date of filing of the application before the AAR the question raised therein was already the subject matter of proceedings before the income tax authorities that the bar in terms of the proviso to Section 245R(2) of the Act would apply. If such application is not already pending on the date of the application, and is the sub .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

143(2) of the Act to the Petitioner on 13th August 2013 in relation to the return filed for AY 2012-13 by merely stating that there are certain points in connection with the return income submitted by you on 29th November 2012 for the assessment year 2012-13 on which I would like some other information does not tantamount to the issues raised in the application filed by the Petitioner before the AAR on 20th September 2013 being already pending before the AAR. 6. In this case, the notice issued b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version