Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia Versus M/s. Shri Badrinarain Alloys & Steels Ltd.

Modvat credit - capital goods installed and commissioned on 16.09.1997 when restricting clause got inserted in Table to Rule-57Q(1) under Notification No.33/97-C.E.(N.T.) dated 01.08.1997 - Held that:- it is observed that amendments/insertions to Rule 57Q(1) and Rule 57 S(11) were made simultaneously under Notification No. 33/97-C.E.(N.T.) dated 01.08.1997. From the above provisions of MODVAT scheme under Central Excise Rules, 1994 it transpires that intention of the legislature behind above ame .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AY] after relying upon the Apex Court's decision in the case of Eicher Motor Ltd. vs. Union of India [1999 (1) TMI 34 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA], the Cenvat Credit of ₹ 24,13,708.68/- has been wrongly allowed by the First Appellate Authority. - Decided in favour of Revenue - Appeal No. E/143/2007, CO-32/2007 - Order No. FO/A/75996/2016 - Dated:- 8-9-2016 - Shri H.K.Thakur, Member (Technical) Sri A.Roy, Suptd.(AR) for the Appellant Sri R.S.Bajaj, CA for the Respondent ORDER Per Shri H. K. Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ucts , was amended by Notification No.33/97-C.E.(N.T.), dated 01.08.1997 to exclude capital goods credit if the same are used in the manufacture of Non-Alloy Steel Ingots and billets. That since on the date of commencing commercial production debarring clause was existing in table to Rule-57Q(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, therefore, no capital goods credit was admissible to the appellant who was availing compounded levy scheme under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. That furthe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

000. 3. Shri R.S.Bajaj (CA) appearing on behalf of the respondent argued that as per para-9 of CBEC Circular No.345/2/2000-TRU dt. 29.08.2000 credit of capital goods credit was admissible. That First Appellate Authority has correctly relied upon Apex Court s decision in the case of Eicher Motors Ltd.& Anr. v. Union of India &Ors. [1999 -(XC2)-GJX-0387-SC]. Learned CA also relied upon case law Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd.-vs.-CCE, Chandigarh[2004-(XC2)-GJX-2918-CESTAT]. 4. As a count .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(Supra) has been considered by Bombay High Court and has been distinguished. That in view of this case law credit of capital goods is not admissible to the respondent and Commissioner (Appeal) order is required to be set aside. 5. Heard both sides and perused the case records. The issue involved is whether respondent is eligible to take Modvat Credit on capital goods installed and commissioned on 16.09.1997 when restricting clause got inserted in Table to Rule-57Q(1) under Notification No.33/97- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me was applicable to appellant, therefore, capital goods credit is not admissible and even if it was admissible prior to 16.09.1997 the same is deemed to have lapsed by virtue of Rule 57S(11) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Sr.No.1 of the table to Rule 57Q(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, as amended by Notification No. 33/97-C.E.(N.T.) dated 01.08.1997 read as follows: TABLE S.No. Description of capital goods falling within the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985(5 of 1986) a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

whether or not any other goods are produced in such induction furnace, and hot re-rolled products of non-alloy steel falling under sub-heading No.s 7211.11, 7211.19, 7211.30, 7211.52, 7211.59, 7211.60, 7211.92, 7211.99, 7213.90, 7214.90, 7215.90, 7216.10 and 7216.90 on which duty is paid under section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944).] 6.1. Rule 57Q(7) of the Central Excise Rules 1944 read as follows: (7) The credit of the specified duty on capital goods [other than those capital g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

LE 57S. Manner of utilization of the capital goods and the credit allowed in respect of duty paid thereon.- (1) . (2) . (3) . (4) . (5) .. (6) .. (7) .. (8) .. (9) .. (10) [(11) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (3) of rule 57Q, any credit of specified duty lying unutilised,- (a) on the first day of August, 1997, with the manufacturer of ingots and billets of non-alloy steel falling under sub-heading Nos.7206.90 and 7207.90 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

16.90 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986), and who is required to pay duty under section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), shall lapse and shall not be allowed to be utilised for payment of duty on any excisable goods, whether cleared for home consumption or for export.] 7. Amendments/insertions to Sr.No.1 of Table to Rule 57Q(1) and Rule 57 S(11) were made simultaneously under Notification No. 33/97-C.E.(N.T.) dated 01.08.1997. From the above provisi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er Motors Ltd. vs. Union of India (Supra) which was delivered when Section 37(1) (xxviii) was not existing. It was introduced in the Central Excise Act, 1944 as per Sections 131 and 132 of the Finance Act, 1999 with retrospective effect. Learned AR has correctly relied upon the case law of Coral Cosmetics Ltd. vs. Union of India (Supra) where Bombay High Court has noted Apex Court s decision in the case of Eicher Motor Ltd. vs. Union of India (Supra) and made following observations /distinction .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

credit balance which was not taken away by substantive legislation. This lacunae came to be removed by Sections 131 and 132 of the Finance Act, 1999 and said sections have only made small repairs by adopting permissible mode of legislation. 31. The Central Government by Notification No. 57/97-C.E. (N.T.) dated 18th September, 1997 amended Rule 57-F by inserting clause (e) in sub-Rule (17) whereby unutilised Modvat credit lying to the credit of the assessee as on 1st October, 1997 was allowed to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

In other words, Sections 131 and 132 of the Finance Act have removed the illegality pointed out by the Supreme Court in the case of Eicher Motors Ltd. (supra), wherein the foundation on which the decision was based, has been fundamentally altered by the said provision. The Parliament, inter alia; validated clause (e) of sub-Rule (17) of Rule 57 of the said Rules with retrospective effect. 33. It is no doubt true that in Eicher Motors Ltd. (supra) the Apex Court ruled that the Modvat credit stan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t which is, normally, held to be retrospective. A remedial Act, on the contrary, is not necessarily retrospective, it may be either enlarging or restraining and it takes effect prospectively, unless it has retrospective effect by express terms or necessary intendment, [see AIR 1960 S.C. 12 (Para 29) - The Central Bank of India and others v. Their Workman and also AIR 1973 S.C. 1227 - The Workmen of M/s. Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Management and others.] Sometimes it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

slation, which was noticed by the Apex Court, stood removed by virtue of the said amendment. 8.1. Further Bombay High Court in the above case law made following observations in paragraphs 34 to 36 :- 34. In Allied Motors (P) Ltd. v. CI.T., (1997) 3 S.C.C. 472, certain unintended consequences flowed from a provision enacted by Parliament. There was an obvious omission. In order to cure the defect, a proviso was sought to be introduced through an amendment. The Court held that literal construction .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion as a whole. 35. In the case of Krishnamurthi & Co. v. State of Madras, (1973) 31 STC 190, the Apex Court observed: The object of such an enactment is to remove and rectify the defect in phraseology or lacuna of other nature and also to validate the proceedings, including realisation of tax, which have taken place in pursuance of the earlier enactment which has been found by the court to be vitiated by an infirmity. Such an amending and Validating Act in the very nature of things has a re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Forum: 3B mistake

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version