TMI Blog2015 (11) TMI 1566X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s sought for need not be granted to the petitioner - Held that: - no illegality found in the order and explanation given by respondent denying the request of cross examination - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - petition dismissed - decided against petitioner. - W.P. (C) No. 34057 of 2015 (F) - - - Dated:- 11-11-2015 - A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. Smt. P.V. Rema, Advocate, for th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uest for cross-examination of the said persons was made before the respondent, who proceeded to pass Ext.P5 order giving detailed reasons as to why he was of the view that a cross-examination of the persons sought for need not be granted to the petitioner. In Ext.P5, the respondent specifically deals with the request of the petitioner, and finds as follows : i. Cross-examination of all office ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r intimation to undersigned. Accordingly the request for cross-examining all officers who assessed/audited/examined the impugned consignments cannot be acceded to. ii. Cross-examination of co-noticee Sri Reji Cherian : Apart from a broad statement that noticee No. 2 was seeking cross-examination of Sri Reji Cherian for rebutting the allegations of abetting evasion of duty by furnishing fal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
