GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (9) TMI 388 - ITAT CHENNAI

2016 (9) TMI 388 - ITAT CHENNAI - TMI - Unexplained investment under section 69 - Held that:- Had it been genuine transaction, the assessee should have been explained the entire transaction between the assessee and Shri Prasad Potluri and the circumstances under which it was paid by Shri Prasad Potluri to the assessee on behalf of Indira Production Pvt. Ltd. Further, the Assessing Officer during the course of assessment requested Indira Production Pvt. Ltd. for the personal appearance and explai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lakhs in the Dena Bank account has not properly explained. Therefore, the provisions of section 69 of the Act was rightly invoked by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A). - Decided against assessee - Adhoc addition towards gross remuneration for “Kushi” – Hindi version of movie - Held that:- Admittedly, in this case, the assessee has filed a statement before us confirming the receipt of income from Narasimha Enterprises owned by Shri Bonny Kapoor for ₹.1,15,96,414/-. I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

we direct the Assessing Officer to consider the revised computation of income for the assessment year 2002-03 with reference to the income at ₹.1,27,28,414/- subject to our finding in para 3.5 herein below. In other words, the assessee is not entitled for loss of ₹.11 lakhs in respect of “Kushi” Telugu movie. - Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A.No.1863/Mds/2014 - Dated:- 27-7-2016 - Shri Chandra Poojari, Accountant Member and Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Judicial Member For The Appell .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome Tax Act, 1961 [ Act in short]. 2.1 The Brief facts of the case are that at the time of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee has deposited an amount of ₹.30 lakhs in his bank account maintained in Dena Bank, T. Nagar Branch, Chennai in account No. 10728, which had been invested on the same day in the fixed deposit in FD/4461/3 on 21.12.2001. The Assessing Officer has called for explanation for this amount regarding source and nature of the transactions. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment of account, wherein, stating that an amount of ₹.30.00 lakhs was passed on to the assessee on 14.12.2001 by way of journal entry paid to the assessee through Shri Prasad Potluri on behalf of the company. According to the ld. AR, the said amount was received by the assessee from Indira Production Pvt. Ltd. through Shri Prasad Potluri and it has to be considered as explained. The ld. DR has submitted that the evidence brought on record was not sufficient to hold that the source of ͅ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ri has paid this amount to the assessee. There is no counter confirmation from Shri Prasad Potluri. Had it been genuine transaction, the assessee should have been explained the entire transaction between the assessee and Shri Prasad Potluri and the circumstances under which it was paid by Shri Prasad Potluri to the assessee on behalf of Indira Production Pvt. Ltd. Further, the Assessing Officer during the course of assessment requested Indira Production Pvt. Ltd. for the personal appearance and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7;.30 lakhs in the Dena Bank account has not properly explained. Therefore, the provisions of section 69 of the Act was rightly invoked by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A). Thus, we find no infirmity in the orders of authorities below on this issue and accordingly, the same is confirmed. 3. The next ground raised in the appeal of the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of ₹.1 crore as income of the assessee based on the statement of Shr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce under section 142(1) of the Act was issued to the assessee after survey conducted at the premises of the assessee on 04.09.2003 and issued a notice under section 148 of the Act on 30.03.2004. The assessee received remuneration for the Hindi version of film Kushi of ₹.50 lakhs from Shri Bonny Kapoor and claimed an expenditure of ₹.10 lakhs. The net income shown was ₹.40 lakhs. Against enquiry with Shri Bonny Kapoor, who has stated that the original agreement for directing Hin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the Hindi film Kushi . Further, at the time of assessment, the assessee filed revised computation of income which reads as under: Rs. Income admitted as return dated 15.09.2004 40,00,000 Add: Amount paid treated as advance originally 05.10.2001 10,00,000 02.11.2001 10,00,000 12.02.2002 5,00,000 01.04.2002 10,00,000 Difference in statement treated as personal and not related profession as per statement 16,25,028 Outstanding payment due 34,13,386 85,38,414 Sri Surya Movies: Telugu Kushi remuner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0 3. Unexplained investment 30,00,000 1,83,00,000 Less: Office expenses and air ticket 14,61,586 Assessed income 1,68,34,414 3.2 Before the ld. CIT(A), the assessee challenged the ad-hoc addition of ₹.1.00 crore towards gross remuneration for Kushi - Hindi version of movie. The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition of ₹.1.00 crore. 3.3 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 3.4 We have heard both sides, perused the materials on record and gone through the orders of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

12-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version