Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Maruti Suzuki India Limited Versus C.C.E. Delhi-III

2016 (9) TMI 627 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH

Cenvat credit - recovery as wrongly availed in respect of capital goods used exclusively for R&D purposes - machines/ equipments/ apparatus installed in engineering Research Design and Development laboratory was located in the buildings separately from the production area - Held that:- the assessee’s R&D facility is located within the factory premises registered with the Central Excise Department, housed in buildings which are different from the factory sheds. When considered with reference to t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stainable inasmuch as it is allowable under the definition of capital goods under the Cenvat Credit Rules in view of the various decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court, High Court and Tribunal. - Decided in favour of appellant - Excise Appeal Nos. 51748 -51749 of 2014 - Final Order No. A/60987-60988/2016-EX[DB] - Dated:- 19-7-2016 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) and Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) Sh. B. L. Narasimhan, Advocate for the Appellant Sh. G. M. Sharma, D. R. for the Responden .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

irections of the Hon ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana vide their order dated 29.02.2016. In the above order the Hon ble High Court ordered this Tribunal to decide the matter afresh and to pass a reasoned speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law. The direction of the Hon ble High Court is an under: 7. A show cause notice dated 20-3-2013 (Annexure A-1) was issued to the assessee for recovery of ₹ 9,97,38,882/- along with interest .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thereof shows that it does not satisfy the test of a reasoned and speaking order. Para 3 is quoted below :- The definition of capital goods as given in Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 covers the goods listed in this sub-rule, which have been used in the factory of manufacture of final product. Thus, for capital goods Cenvat credit, their use in or in relation to manufacture of final product is not required and their use in the factory of manufacture for the purpose whether in or in re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the above, since the order dated 15-1-2015 (Annexure A-3) does not qualify being a reasoned speaking order as enunciated by the Apex Court in M/s. Kranti Associates Pvt. Ltd. s case (supra), accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the order dated 15-1-2015 (Annexure A-3) passed by the Tribunal is set aside. The matter is remitted to the Tribunal to decide the same afresh and for passing a well reasoned speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was visited by the officers of internal audit from the Department in November, 2012 during which it was noticed that the appellant had availed cenvat credit in respect of capital goods used exclusively for R&D purposes. The internal audit team found that the cenvat credit was taken duty paid on machines/ equipments/ apparatus installed in engineering Research Design and Development laboratory which was located in the buildings separately from the production area. These capital goods were use .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rmed the demand alongwith interest and also imposed penalty of equal amount. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal who decided the matter vide order dated 15.01.2015 in which the impugned order was set-aside. The Revenue challenged this order before the Hon ble High Court who remitted the matter to this Tribunal to decide the same afresh and to pass a reasoned, speaking order. 4. In the appellant s challenge of the impugned order, they have argued that the cenvat cred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

including the case of USV Limited vs. CCE, Mumbai - 2006 (195) ELT 158 (Tri. Mum.). 5. Ld. DR on the other hand supported the impugned order of the Commissioner with the argument that the capital goods in question were not used for the manufacture of final product but were solely used for the purpose of R&D. he further argued that since the R&D activities, where the capital goods were installed, were in building separated from the production area, it cannot be said that the capital goods .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(i) all goods falling under chapter 83, Chapter 84, Chapter 85, Chapter 90, heading No. 68.05 grinding wheels and the like, and parts thereof falling under heading 6804 of the First Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act; (ii) pollution control equipment; (iii) components, spars and accessories of the goods specified at (i) and (ii); (iv) moulds and dies, jigs and fixtures; (v) refractories and refractory materials; (vi) tubes and pipes and fittings thereof; and (vii) storage tank, used- (1) In the f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acturer of the final product. There is an exclusion however to any equipment or appliance used in office. 8. In is on record that the assessee s R&D facility is located within the factory premises registered with the Central Excise Department, housed in buildings which are different from the factory sheds. When considered with reference to the definition of capital goods given above, we are of the view that there is no bar in using the capital goods in the buildings earmarked for R&D act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version