Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Elcon Drugs and Formulations Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (2) , Jaipur.

Non-deduction of tax in respect of interest paid to non-banking finance companies - Held that:- Since there are conflicting views of the Hon’ble High Courts, therefore, the view favourable to the assessee is being adopted by respectfully following the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Vegetable Products Ltd (1973 (1) TMI 1 - SUPREME Court ). The fact whether the amount was outstanding requires verification at the end of the AO hence the order of the ld. CIT (A) is set .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ictional High Court in the case of G.K. Contractor [2009 (1) TMI 840 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] has held that when estimated profit is considered after rejecting assessee’s books of accounts by invoking the provisions of section 145(3) of the Act, no separate addition can be made even u/s 68 of the Act, even though the assessee has failed to discharge the onus of proof in explaining the amount shown in the books of accounts as ‘market outstanding’. Respectfully following the same, we direct the AO .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nsidering the totality of the facts and considering the past history of the assessee, we restrict the disallowance to the extent of ₹ 15,00,000/-. The AO is directed to restrict the addition to the extent of ₹ 15,00,000/-. This ground of the assessee is partly allowed. - ITA No. 995/JP/2013 - Dated:- 4-8-2016 - SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM For The Assessee by : Shri Rohan Sogani (CA) For The Revenue : Shri Raghuvir Singh Dagur (Addl. CIT) ORDER PER SHRI KUL B .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ay please be granted by quashing the said disallowance of ₹ 1,840/-. 2. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT (A) has erred in confirming the action of the ld. AO in disallowing a sum of ₹ 4,36,455/- of interest paid to following NBFCs u/s 40(a)(ia) of IT Act, 1961 :- S.No. Name of Parties Amount (in Rs. 1. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. 54,347/- 2. Cholamandalam DBS 69,170/- 3. Indiabulls Financial 3,12,938/- Total : 4,36,455/- The action of the ld.CIT (A) is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ranchi 1,14,800/- Total : 3,50,800/- The action of the ld. CIT (A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the case. Relief may please be granted by deleting the said addition of ₹ 3,50,800/-. 4.(a) In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT (A) has erred in confirming the action of the ld. AO in rejecting the books of accounts of the assessee by invoking the provisions of section 145(3) and thereafter making a trading addition of ₹ 23,39,08 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. CIT (A) has erred in confirming the action of the ld. AO in not considering the submissions made during the course of assessment proceedings. The action of the ld. CIT (A) is illegal, unjustified, arbitrary and against the facts of the case. Relief may please be granted by considering the complete submissions and granting relief accordingly. 2. Briefly stated the facts are that the case of the assessee was picked up for scrutiny and the assessment was framed under section 143(3) vide order dat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

made on account of disallowance of penalty of sales tax of ₹ 1,840/-, confirmed the addition of ₹ 4,36,455/- on account of interest u/s 40(a)(ia), confirmed the addition of ₹ 3,50,800/- u/s 68 and also trading addition of ₹ 23,39,083/- and deleted the addition made on account of PF contribution. 3. The first ground of the assessee s appeal is against confirming disallowance of a sum of ₹ 1840/- on account of sales tax. 3.1. The ld. Counsel for the assessee does not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

submitted that the entire expenditures were paid during the year under appeal. No amount was outstanding on the last date of financial year. He relied on the decisions rendered in the case of Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (2012) 16 ITR (Trib.) 1 (Vishakhapatnam)(SB), CIT vs. Vector Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No. 5219/Del/2012. The ld. Counsel submitted that this view has been followed by the Coordinate Bench of the Tribunal at Jaipur. The ld. Counsel submitted that when two .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on of Hon ble Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case of Palam Gas Service vs. CIT (2015) 370 ITR 740 (HP). 4.3. We have heard rival contentions and perused the material on record. The contention of the ld. Counsel for the assessee is that no amount was outstanding on the last date of financial year and relied upon the decisions of Coordinate Bench in the case of Girdhari Lal Bargoti (ITA No. 757/JP/2012) and K.Y. Continental Interiors (P) Ltd. (ITA No. 595/JP/2013) wherein the Coordinate Bench .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Vegetable Products Ltd (supra). The fact whether the amount was outstanding requires verification at the end of the AO hence the order of the ld. CIT (A) is set aside. The issue is restored to the file of the AO to verify whether any amount is payable on the last date of financial year in the balance sheet and in case he finds that no amount is payable on the last day of the financial year, he would delete the disallowance. 5. Ground no. 3 is a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

can be made to the income of the assessee. The ld. Counsel submitted that where books are rejected by the AO, no further addition can be made. Reliance is placed on the decision of Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Dulla Ram (2014) 42 taxmann.com 349 (P&H). 5.2. On the contrary, the ld. D/R supported the orders of the authorities below. 5.3. We have heard rival contentions and perused the material available on record. We find that the advances are in the nature of trade .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version