Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Krishna Tarpaulin Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs, Commissionerate II, Chennai

2016 (9) TMI 671 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Application to issue writ of mandamus - direction to the respondent to provide documents / informations, as requested for by the petitioner - SCN - Sections 28 and 124 of the Customs Act, 1962 - import of PVC Flex banners - import from Malaysia or from China - copies of documents - mahazars - Held that: - during the course of adjudication, if the petitioner's contention is that, certain documents recovered from the office premises of those three companies are relevant, it would always be open to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iod of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after which the respondent shall fix the date of personal hearing and proceed to complete the adjudication, in accordance with law. - petition dismissed - decided against petitioner. - Writ Petition No.3876 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.3244 of 2016, 7998 of 2016 and 10257 of 2016 - Dated:- 29-6-2016 - MR. T.S. SIVAGNANAM J. Mr. J. Shankar Raman, for Mr. S. Venkatachalam for the Petitioner. Mr. A.P. Srinivas for the Respondent. ORDER .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

14. 3. The petitioner is one among the eighteen Notices to whom a show cause notice was issued on 06.01.2014, under Sections 28 and 124 of the Customs Act, 1962. There are various allegations made in the show cause notice and for the purpose of disposal of this writ petition, those facts may not be necessary and it would suffice to state that the issue involves import of PVC Flex banners, which, according to the petitioner, was imported from Malaysia, but the Department proposed to reject the st .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vered from M/s MM Enterprises. 4. Pursuant to this representation, the DRI, by reply, dated 02.05.2014, stated that the relied upon documents, vide Annexures A-7 to A-9, have already been supplied along with the show cause notice. These three annexures are stated to have been relating to those three companies, whose names have been mentioned above. 5. On receipt of the reply, the petitioner addressed the respondent, by letter, dated 13.06.2014 stating that, what they have asked for are the copie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of personal hearing was issued to the petitioner, dated 06.10.2015, fixing the personal hearing on 15.10.2015. On receipt of the same, once again the petitioner submitted another representation, requesting the copies of the documents and requesting permission to cross-examine the persons from whom documents have been recovered. In the meantime, there has been several other correspondences and the petitioner, on 21.12.2015, submitted their interim reply. Pursuant to which, the personal hearing w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version