Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s RV General Trading Versus Union of India & Others

2016 (9) TMI 673 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Re-assessment of value of goods - re-calculation of duty - order passed under section 17 of the act or section 18 of the act - opportunity of being heard - Rule 12 of the Customs Valuations (Determination Value of Imported Goods) Rules 2007 - alternative remedy of appeal - Retail Sale Price - bill of entry - Held that: - the petitioner was not been afforded proper opportunity of hearing, the order dated 18.03.2016 for re-assessment of goods is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nity of hearing to the petitioner. - Petition disposed off - decided partly in favor of petitioner. - CWP No. 6098 of 2016 (O&M) - Dated:- 31-8-2016 - Rajesh Bindal And Harinder Singh Sidhu, JJ. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocatefor the petitioner Mr. Saurabh Goel, Advocate for the respondents ORDER Rajesh Bindal, J The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the order dated 18.03.2016 (Annexure P-1) whereby the value of goods imported by the petitioner was reassessed and the duty was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he goods, but the same was not considered. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the order in fact has been passed under Section 17 of the Act. It has wrongly been recorded therein that it has been passed under Section 18 of the Act. He further submitted that before passing of the order under Section 18 or 17 of the Act, no opportunity is to be granted by the Department unless it is specifically prayed for. He referred to Rule 12 of the Customs Valuations (Determi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion that the impugned order passed by respondent No.3 deserves to be set aside as the same has been passed in violation of principles of natural justice. It is undisputed case that before passing the order, the petitioner was not afforded any opportunity of hearing, even if the order is considered to have been passed under Section 17 of the Act. Initially, the Department raised queries regarding valuation while referring to earlier bill of entry of the petitioner, which was responded to by the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oner stating that bill of entry mentioned by the department was provisionally assessed and further the value of one of the items now imported had been on higher value than what was shown in the earlier bill of entry. A request was made by the petitioner for provisional assessment of duty and further for passing a speaking order after clearing the goods. It was replied to, by the petitioner on 10.03.2016. Without raising further query to the petitioner or affording any opportunity of hearing, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version