Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (9) TMI 685 - CESTAT KOLKATA

2016 (9) TMI 685 - CESTAT KOLKATA - TMI - Waiver of interest and penalties - imposed under Section 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - Security Agency services - appellant had already paid ₹ 33,450/- of service tax out of the total amount of ₹ 78,359/- appellant has a reasonable cause for not paying service tax as the same was not paid by the recipient - Held that:- so far as chargeability of interest on the Service Tax amount due is concerned, it is observed that appellant has not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tment because Service Tax was not separately recovered from the service recipient. Appellant's case is, therefore, covered under the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 and accordingly penalties imposed upon the appellant under Section 76 and 77 are set aside. - Decided partly in favour of appellant - Service Tax Appeal No. 541/2012 - Dated:- 5-5-2016 - Sri H.K. Thakur , Hon ble Technical Member Sri S.S. Mishra (Managing Partner of Appellant) For the Appellant Sri S. S. Chatterjee, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 33,450/- was already paid by the appellant. That a demand-cum-show cause notice was issued to the appellant demanding service tax of ₹ 44,919/- alongwith interest and for imposition of penalties. That adjudicating authority under Order-in-original dated 24/3/2010 confirmed the demanded amount alongwith interest and also imposed penalties under Section 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. That out of the total amount confirmed, the appellant had already paid amounts of ₹ 7,244/- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appellant has a reasonable cause for not paying service tax as the same was not paid by the recipient therefore penalties imposed under Section 76 and 78 are required to be waived under the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. 3. Shri S.S. Chatterjee, Supdt. (A.R. ) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that the provisions of Service Tax under Security Agency services were very clear and there was no ambiguity. It was his case that penalties under Section 76 and 78 were correct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version