Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Sri Senthil Mills Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward I (1) , Pollachi

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimate income on sale of yarn - Held that:- In the present case, the assessee has taken a plea as stated above that addition was made on estimate basis. The Assessing Officer placed reliance on the survey report collected during the course of survey and also inspection report of sales tax authorities and central excise authorities. However, the material brought on record that the gross profit rate of every year is not constant, it depends upon various factors like deman .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lment of sale of yarn, levying penalty in this case cannot be sustained. Accordingly, this is not a fit case for levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. We are inclined to delete the penalty in respect of estimate income on sale of yarn. - Aaddition sustained u/s 68 - Held that:- After going through the explanation of the assessee, we are of the opinion that the explanation given by the assessee was a possible one though it was not satisfactory. The Tribunal has noticed these facts in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. - Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - Held that:- There is a judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs Vatika Construction Pvt. Ltd. [2012 (10) TMI 808 - DELHI HIGH COURT] wherein held that when there is addition u/s 40A(3) of the Act levy of penalty on this disallowance u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not justified. Further, in our opinion, disallowance u/s 40A(3) cannot be construed as concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. In view of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(9) TMI 775 - SUPREME COURT ], wherein held that imposition of penalty would be unwarranted in case the assessee has committed an inadvertent and bona fide error and had not intended to or attempted to either conceal its income or furnish inaccurate particulars of income. Merely because the assessee claimed deduction of interest expenditure which had not been accepted by the Assessing Officer, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not attracted, merely making a claim which is not sustainable in l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o appeals of the assessee are against the different order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-II, Coimbatore, dated 29.9.2012 for assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 wherein the CIT(A) confirmed the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Since the issue involved in these appeals are common in nature, these were clubbed together, heard together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. In I.T.A.No.2150/Mds/2012 for assessment year 200 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

additions cannot be considered as concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars warranting levy of penalty. 4. Your appellant further states that statutory disallowance under section 40A(3) in respect of payments made in a village without banking facilities cannot justify levy of penalty particularly in view of provisions of Rule 6DD. 5. Your appellant further states that additions made under section 68 in respect of payments received by cheques as confirmed in the assessment ord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r 2005-06 on 27.10.2005 admitting loss of ₹ 1,15,634/-. A survey u/s 133A of the Act was conducted in the case of the assessee on 16.2.2007. Subsequently, the case was subjected to scrutiny. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer made the following additions: (i) Addition u/s 68 of the Act ₹ 74,75,000 (ii) Suppressed sale of yarn ₹ 38,18,131 (iii) Disallowance u/s 40A(3) ₹ 9,56,300 4. Aggrieved by the above order, the assessee went in appeal be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

maximum penalty of ₹ 38,88,141/-. Against this, the assessee carried the matter before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) confirmed the levy of penalty. However, he reduced the penalty at 100% of tax sought to be evaded instead of 200% levied by the Assessing Officer. Against this the assessee is in appeal before us. 6. The ld. AR submitted that the addition towards suppressed sale, the Assessing Officer estimated the suppressed sale at ₹ 22,23,566/-. However, the same was reduced to ₹ 11 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng. It would depend upon market conditions. In this assessment year, the machinery was kept idle and also there is rate difference of raw material. Because the addition was sustained by the Tribunal for this assessment year, it cannot be reason for sustaining penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act in the penalty proceedings. 7. On the other hand, the ld. Departmental Representative submitted that there was an inspection carried out by the sales tax authorities and also central excise authorities, who .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssed sales to ₹ 11,47,500/- on account of typographical error in mentioning 30,000 kgs as 3 lakhs of yarn because of which the assessee cannot take advantage that addition was only estimate basis, penalty cannot be levied. 8. We have considered the rival submissions and also perused the material available on record. Originally, the Assessing Officer levied penalty towards addition of suppressed sale of yarn at ₹ 22,23,566/-. However, this addition was reduced to ₹ 11,47,500/- b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Singh vs CIT, 258 ITR 85 (P&H) wherein held that when income is estimated and addition sustained on that basis, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be attracted. For the same proposition, he also relied on the judgment of CIT vs Modi Industrial Corporation 195 taxman 68 (P&H), CIT vs Sangrur Vanaspati Mills Ltd, 303 ITR 53 (P&H), CIT vs Suresh Kumar Bansal, 254 ITR 130 (P&H), and Dr. Hakeem S.A. Syed Sathar vs ACIT, 120 ITD 1(Chennai). In our opinion, it is not in dispute tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssing Officer placed reliance on the survey report collected during the course of survey and also inspection report of sales tax authorities and central excise authorities. However, the material brought on record that the gross profit rate of every year is not constant, it depends upon various factors like demand and supply, inflation situation and production capacity, variable factors like change in direct labour cost and material cost. The lower authorities went on the premise that these facts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nalty in respect of estimate income on sale of yarn. 9. The next issue is with regard to levying penalty in respect of addition sustained u/s 68 of the Act. 10. The assessee said to have received a sum of ₹ 4,77,609/- from M/s Kalavathy Finance Ltd. Since M/s Kalavathy Finance Ltd did not confirm the above transaction, addition was sustained by the CIT(A). According to the Assessing Officer, the assessee has not discharged the burden cast upon it. Consequently, penalty was levied u/s 271(1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Daima, who was located at Bhurhanpur as security advance. Out of the said amount, ₹ 40 lakhs was transferred to M/s Gurusikh Trading Co. and ₹ 35 lakhs to M/s Rishab Trading Co. as per Vijay Daima s instruction. The other two receipts of ₹ 3 lakhs and ₹ 3.5 lakhs are recorded in the books of account and ledger of M/s Kalavathy Finance Ltd. However, no confirmation by it. The assessee did not give any details in this regard during the course of first appellate proceedings .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee failed to explain the same, hence, penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is to be confirmed. 13. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The main contention of the assessee is that the transaction between M/s Kalavathy Finance Ltd and the assessee is not disputed. However, there was a difference of ₹ 4,77,609/- due to nonreconciliation between the accounts of these parties. After going through the explanation of the assessee, we are of the opinion .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion of the assessee about the genuineness of the receipts. Accordingly, in our opinion, this issue is not a fit case for levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Placing reliance on the order of the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Supreme Steel and General Mills vs DCIT 45 CCH 61, (Delhi Tribunal), we delete the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 14. The next issue is with regard to penalty on disallowance of ₹ 9,56,300/- u/s 40A(3) of the Act. 15. The Assessing Officer invoked the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nalty. 17. We heard the rival submissions on this issue. There is a judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs Vatika Construction Pvt. Ltd. 229 taxman 562 wherein held that when there is addition u/s 40A(3) of the Act levy of penalty on this disallowance u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not justified. Further, in our opinion, disallowance u/s 40A(3) cannot be construed as concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. In view of the judgment of the Deli High Court .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the partners. b) Profit on sale of machinery reworked on the basis of income tax records. c) Difference noticed at the time of survey on 16.2.2007 which date falls in the subsequent year d) Addition made for want of copy of invoice in respect of purchase which has not been proved to be false where payment was made by cheque. e) Addition made adopting fluctuating conversion factor towards investment in stock, particulars when the sale accounted are more than the yield as worked out on the basis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

see filed its return of income for the assessment year 2006-07 on 31.1.2005 admitting income of ₹ 6,82,530/-. A survey u/s 133A of the Act was conducted in the case of the assessee on 16.2.2007. Subsequently, the case was subjected to scrutiny. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer made the following additions: (i) Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act ₹ 1,19,199 (ii) Short Term capital gains ₹ 6,26,718 (iii) Addition u/s 68 ₹ 15,30,680 (i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 4,91,599 Total ₹ 29,03,224 22. It is also noted that the assessee has not challenged the disallowance towards unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of ₹ 1,19,999/-, short term capital gains of ₹ 6,26,718/-, stock in process of ₹ 5,36,355/- and undisclosed sale of yarn of ₹ 43,800/-. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act and levied penalty at ₹ 27,07,062/- being 200% of tax sought to be evaded as against the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the former part of this order, we delete the penalty. 24. The next addition for levying penalty is stock in process not considered in closing stock to the extent of ₹ 5,36,355/-. The addition is made only on estimate basis. As discussed in para 8 of this order, we delete the penalty. 25. The last issue is with regard to penalty levied under wrong computation o short term capital gains disallowance to the extent of ₹ 6,26,718/-. 26. The ld. AR submitted that it is an inadvertent err .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version