Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Income Tax Officer, Ward XV (1) , Chennai Versus Smt. Ayisha Fathima

2016 (9) TMI 704 - ITAT CHENNAI

Capital gains arise for assessment on transfer of land by the assessee along with other person - Transfer in terms of Section 2(47)(v) - Joint Development Agreement (JDA) entered by the assessee on 09.07.2005 with the developer - Held that:- What was the intention of the assessees at the time of acquiring the land or interval action by the assessee between the period from purchase and sale of the land and the relevant improvement/development taken place during this time is relevant for deciding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nception. In a case where the purchase has been made solely and exclusively with the intention to resell at a profit and the purchaser has no intention of holding the property for himself or otherwise enjoying or using it, the presence of such an intention is a relevant factor and unless it is offset by the presence of other factors it would raise as strong presumption that the transaction is an adventure in the nature of trade. Even so, the presumption is not conclusive and it is conceivable th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the land in future at that point of time. It was due to certain compelling circumstances came into picture at a later stages, the assessees were forced to sell the land. Merely because of the fact that the land was sold in a short period of holding, it cannot be held that income arising from the sale of land was taxable as profit arising from the adventure in the nature of trade. The period of holding should not suggest that the activity was an adventure in the nature of trade. - Further, we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the case before us cannot be considered as a transfer of capital asset or the transaction relating to sale of land was not an adventure in the nature of trade so as to tax the income arising out of this transaction as business income. Accordingly, the ground raised by the Revenue is dismissed.. - I.T.A.No.1371/Mds./2013 - Dated:- 17-8-2016 - SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI G.PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The Appellant : Mr.Durai Pandian,ACIT,DR For The Respondent : Mr.S.Sridh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evelopment Agreement (JDA) entered by the assessee on 09.07.2005 with the developer. 3 The facts of the case are that the assessee is the owner of 50% of the land at Egattur Vilalge, measuring 6 acres and 21 cents. The other 50% was owned by her brother. The assessee sold the property vide document registered on 01.04.2008 to M/s.OMR Mall Developers Pvt Ltd., and received consideration as follows:- 1,45,295 Sq.ft. Rs.13,68,00,280/- i) ₹ 1,44,00,000/- received as advance. ii) ₹ 4,45,1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld, which is an agricultural land and there is no liability of capital gains tax. More so, the assessee originally entered into JDA with M/s.Allied Majestic Promoters on 09.07.2005 and according to the assessee, the transfer took place in the assessment year 2006-07 and not in the assessment year 2009-10. The AO disagreeing with the contention of the AO observed that the transfer took place vide registered sale deed dated 01.04.2008 to M/s.OMR Mall Developers Pvt Ltd.. Against the order of ld. A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ltivation-of agricultural crops till the assessee handed over the possession of lands to Megistic Promotors on 09.07.2005, under Joint Development agreement. Even in the joint development agreement the lands were shown as agricultural lands with standing crops. Assessee s declaration of agricultural income in her returns of income filed up to A.Y.2006-07 clearly proves that the lands are agricultural lands and are under agricultural use only. Further, since the assessee transferred and handed ov .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

constitute capital asset for the purpose of sec.2( 14) of the Act. According to Ld.CIT(A), consequent to the Joint Development Agreement with M/s. Allied Megistic Promotors on 09.07.2005, the assessee and her brother, received part of the consideration of ₹ 2,00,00,000/- as advance, handed over the possession of the property to M/s. Allied Megistic Promotors and also executed General Power of Attorney in favour of Shri A. Abdul Wadood (the managing partner of M/s. Allied Megistic Promotors .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

further be visualized from the following facts:- • The GPAs executed as per the Joint Development Agreement on 09.07.2005 are still in force and in fact they were being used even after the final registration of the lands in the name of M/s.OMR Mall Developers P Ltd. • The advance of ₹ 2 00 00000 June 2005 (by M/s.Allied Megistic Promotors) was shown as the advance paid by M/s.OMR Mall Developers P Ltd. • M/s.OMR Mall Developers P Ltd. is only nominee of Megistic Promotors a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erefore, handing over the possession of the property, based on the Joint Development Agreement on 09.07.2005, to M/s. Allied Megistic Promoters, will amount to part performance under sec.53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The same amounts to transfer within the definition of Clause (vi) of sec.2(47) of the Act. Therefore there was a clear transfer of property on 09.07.2005 (i.e. in the F.Y.2005-06). In fact, the assessee also cleared the transfer of the lands in her return of income filed for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the consideration to tax under the head capital gains (or other heads) does not arise in the financial year 2008-09, relevant to the assessment year 2009-10. Therefore, the Assessing Officer s action of bringing the sale proceeds of the said agricultural lands to capital gains tax, especially in A.Y.2009- 10, is not justified and deleted. Aggrieved by the order of Ld.CIT(A), the Revenue is in appeal before us on this issue. 4. The Ld.D.R submitted that mere signing of the JDA between the owner a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oject. It is stated here that the consideration could not even be quantified at the time of JDA as the cost of construction relating to the owner could be quantified only at the time of completion of the project. Ld.D.R submitted that the JDA was a conditional agreement for specific performance by the Developer, which they failed to comply with and hence there was no transfer as on the date of JDA. Ld.D.R further submitted that the subject land was agricultural land as the nature of land has cha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(27)(v) of the Act. Ld.D.R submitted that there was no transfer in terms of Section 2(47)(v) of the Act in respect of impugned property, though the registration was done on 01.04.2008 which was in continuation of the Joint Development Agreement (JDA) entered by the assessee on 09.07.2005 with the developer. Ld.D.R relied on the decision of the Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench in the case of Ms.K.Radhika Vs. CIT (2011)(13 Taxmann 92) and Hon ble Apex Court in the case of Sardar Govindrao Mahadik Vs. Dev .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eed is only to continuation of this JDA. Further referring to the copy of JDA dated 09.07.2005,ld.A.R submitted that as per clause No.(iv) assessee handed over the possession of entire agricultural land to developer. Further, he submitted that the assessee has received considerable amount of deposits vide clause (ii) of the said deed i.e. JDA. As per clause (vi) of JDA, the time is the essence of the contract agreement and within 30 days, the developer has to obtain the requisite sanction from t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sary agreements and deal with their portion and allotted of the building with the undivided share in the land in the manner deemed fit by the developer. The assessee, as per clause (34), had also undertaken to execute the register sale deed in favour of the developer and their Nominee conveying to them the Schedule B mentioned therein. According to him, readings of the JDA in whole give the impression that the transfer took place in term of section 2(47)(v) of the Act on 09.07.2005 and according .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le property also treats as transfer. In this case, the assessees in exchange of 27% of the constructed area, transferred 73% of the land to the builder and handed over the physical possession. Therefore, it is an exchange of property between the parties. In other words, the assessees exchanged 73% of the landed area for 27% of the constructed area. According to A.R, there is a transfer within the meaning of Section 2(47) (i) of the Act on the date on which the agreement dated 09.07.2005 was exec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d property for enjoyment of the builder. In other words, the assessees transferred 73% of the land area to the builder for its enjoyment. He stated that there was a transfer on 09.07.2005 within the meaning of Section 2(47)(i) and 2(47)(vi) of the Act. Therefore, the relevant transaction took plâce in the financial year 2005-06 which falls in the assessment year. 5.2 According to ld.A.R, the assessee entered into an agreement and handing over the physical possession of the property to buil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n ITA No.1396/Mds./2013 dated 15.05.2015. 6. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. The issue for our consideration is with regard to the year in which the capital gains arise for assessment on transfer of land by the assessee along with other person. We have carefully gone through JDA dated 09.07.2005. The following clauses are reproduced for reference:- Clause 1. The Owner have authorized the Devloper to construct at its own cost of Developer a multistoried complex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er to the Developer or to their Nominiees. If the Developer are able to put up construction more than 2 FSI, the land Owner shall be entitled to get proportionate extra constructed area at 27% for themselves, while the remaining 73% shall be retained by the Developer. 2. The Developer shall allot the Owner s builtup punt area in construction with the Owners and the same will be marked in the plan relating to the project as per the specification prdvided in the Annexure 1 of this agreement and in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

; 2,350/- per sq.ft. That is, if for example, the Developer sells out of their 73% builtup plint area to any prospective buyer at the rate of ₹ 2500/- per sq.ft. then the Developer shall share (2500-2350= 150/2) ₹ 75/- per sq.ft. 4. The owners agree to execute and register necessary Power of Attorney Jointly in favour of the Nominee of the Developer and the Nominee of the Owner for selling 73% of the Undivided share of the land. morefully described in the Schedule A hereunder to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al and other authorities, STPI, Chennai metropolitan The development authority and corporation of Chennai on such terms and conditions has may be agreed to the developer. The developer may in consultation with the owners, decide on the nature of the building to be constructed. 6. The developer shall commence construction of the new building within 30 days of obtaining sanctions from authorities concerned or from the date on which vacant possession of the said property is handed over whichever da .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ny unavoidable delay in the completion of the building due to any ca use or causes beyond the developer s control the parties hereto shall by mutual consent in writing extend the period of performance. 7. It is agreed that the developer will meet and pay all expenses including the expenses incurred for obtaining the sanctioned building plans, approvals, fee to be paid to various authorities and to apply and obtain service connections for use in the building and for engaging architects, construct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urpose of executing the work and development of the schedule A mentioned property. 9. The developer has the right to enter into the necessary agreements and deal with and sell its portion allotted under this agreement as an undivided or divided share of land or as land and building or in any other manner deemed fit by the developer, Subject only to the condition that the developer shall construct and deliver to the owner the 27% share in the built up area. The allotment of exact spaces for the d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing the plans, sanctions, approvals or permits for construction of any building on the said property or for the provision of any amenities or facilities thereto. 21. The Developer shall be entitled to pay such fees, charges or levies and to furnish securities/ in money or otherwise as and when required by the authorities concerned for any demolition or construction activity to be carried out on the said property or for the provision of amenities or facilities thereto. 25. In the alternative, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

entitled to get the construction work done either by themselves or through / other well known constructors or sub-contractors or agents and shall be entitled to give such constructors whole of the construction or any part or parts of the work or constructions, provided that the same shall not relieve the Developer for their liability under this Agreement or from active supervision work during its progress. The developer may if it chooses, assigns this agreement to any other party only after get .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er of Attorney in favour of the Developer for the same subject to clause 4 above. 37. The Owner and the Developer agrees not to change the common name for the project as may be given by the Developer. The Developer agrees to consider the suggestion of the Owners in this regard. 40. The Owners agree to refund the security deposit of 120 lakh to the Developer within two weeks of the Owner being intimated about completion and that the respective space allotted for the owners is fit for taking posse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.07.2005 and also authorized the developer to get necessary approvals for the purpose of construction. The assessee also received substantial amount of ₹ 120 lakhs as refundable deposit. The time is essence of the contract within 30 days from the date of giving vacant position of the property. The Developer has to get the permission for construction of the property. After getting permission for construction in the said property, the developer has to complete the construction within 36 mont .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sions of the section 2(47) of the Act which defines transfer . Under the common law, Transfer of immovable property valuing more than 100 rupees would be made only by executing registered sale deed. However, under Income Tax Act, Sec.2(47) defines Transfer in relation to capital asset. For the purpose of convenience we are extracting Sec.2(47) of the Act. S. 2(47) transfer , in relation to a capital asset, includes,- (i) the sale, exchange or relinquishment of the asset ; or (ii) the extinguishm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882) ; or (vi) any transaction (whether by way of becoming a member of, or acquiring shares in, a co-operative society, company or other association of persons or by way of any agreement or any arrangement or in any other manner whatsoever) which has the effect of transferring, or enabling the enjoyment of, any immovable property : Explanation 1.- For the purposes of sub-clauses (v) and (vi), immovable property shall have the same meani .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r of rights has been characterised as being effected or dependent upon or flowing from the transfer of a share or shares of a company registered or incorporated outside India ; 6.1 It is an admitted fact that in this case for assessment year 2006-07, assessee disclosed the transactions as a Note in her return of income stating as follows:- Note: The assessee has entered into a joint development agreement with Allied Magistic Promoters during the assessment year in respect of Development of agric .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

said to be accepted by the Department that as there was no transfer of capital asset as an agricultural land. It is not the case of the Department that it was subject to any rectification or revision subsequently. Unless the Department disturbed the assessment for assessment year 2006- 07, the Department has precluded from treating the transfer of same land as a transfer in terms of Sec.2(47)(v) of the Act in the assessment year 2009- 10 for whatever reason stated by the AO. In our opinion, mer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and he has shown willingness to perform his part of duty to the assessee and there is no question of going back from his consent to act as builder. This view of ours is fortified by the order of Tribunal in the case of ITO Vs. Shri Bakthavatsalam Gowtham in ITA No.1614/Mds./2010 dated 04.05.2012. Thus, we do not find any error in the findings of the Ld.CIT(A) wherein he has observed that there is no transfer in the assessment year 2009-10 and the same is upheld. 6.3 Without prejudice to the abo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d from the date of agreement to the execution of sale of the property by the assessee. He relied on the order of ld. Assessing Officer. On the other hand, ld.A.R relied on the order of Ld.CIT(A). 6.4 We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Regarding nature of land whether it is agricultural land or not. It is always depend upon the facts of the case. In the present case, originally the asset was acquired by the trust consisting of assessee and her brother as a benefici .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ocess of evaluation and the inference has to be drawn on a cumulative consideration of all the relevant facts. It may be stated here that not all the factors or tests would be present or absent in any case and that in each case one or more of the factors may make appearance and that ultimate decision will have to be reached on a balanced consideration of the totality of the circumstances. The expression agricultural land is not defined in the Act, and now, whether it is agricultural land or not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an agricultural land or not has got to be decided or answered. We reproduce the said 13 tests as follows: 1. Whether the land was classified in the Revenue records as agricultural and whether it was subject to the payment of land revenue? 2. Whether the land was actually or ordinarily used for agricultural purposes at or about the relevant time? 3. Whether such user of the land was for a long period or whether it was of a temporary character or by any of a stopgap arrangement? 4. Whether the in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was the nature of the user of the said portion of the land on the material date? 6. Whether the land, on the relevant date, had ceased to be put to agricultural use? If so, whether it was put to an alternative use? Whether such cesser and/ or alternative user was of a permanent or temporary nature? 7. Whether the land, though entered in Revenue records, had never been actually used for agriculture, that is, it had never been ploughed or tilled? Whether the owner meant or intended to use it for a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Lands Act, 1948, was obtained because the sale or intended sale was in favour of a nonITA agriculturist? If so, whether the sale or intended sale to such non-agriculturists was for non-agricultural or agricultural user? 12. Whether the land was sold on yardage or on acreage basis? 13. Whether an agriculturist would purchase the land for agricultural purposes at the price at which the land was sold and whether the owner would have ever sold the land valuing it as a property yielding agricultural .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tood as comprising within its scope the basic as well as subsequent operations in the process of agriculture and raising on the land all products which have some utility either for someone or for trade and commerce. It will be seen that the term agriculture receives a wider interpretation both in regard to its operation as well as the result of the same. Nevertheless there is present all throughout the basic idea that there must be at the bottom of its cultivation of the land in the sense of til .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he aforesaid case observed that the entries in Revenue records were considered good prima facie evidence. 6.7 The Hon ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Dr. Motibhai D. Patel vs. CIT (1982) 27 CTR (Guj) 238 : (1981) 127 ITR 671 (Guj) referring to the Constitution Bench of the Hon ble Supreme Court had stated that if agricultural operations are being carried on in the land in question at the time when the land is sold and further if the entries in the Revenue records show that the land in ques .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Revenue records are rebutted. 6.8 The Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of CWT vs. H. V. Mungale (1983) 32 CTR (Bom) 301 : (1984) 145 ITR 208 (Bom) held that the Hon ble Supreme Court had pointed out that the entries raised only a rebuttable presumption and some evidence would, therefore, have to be led before taxing authorities on the question of intended user of the land under consideration before the presumption could be rebutted. TheCourt further held that the Supreme Court had clea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ected to the payment of land revenue and that it was actually and ordinarily used for agricultural purpose at the relevant time. 6.9 We may also refer to the case of CIT vs. ManilalSomnath (1977) 106 ITR 917 (Guj), wherein the Division Bench of the Hon ble Gujarat High Court observed that the potential non- agricultural value of the land for which a purchaser may be prepared to pay a large price would not detract from its character as agricultural land on the relevant date of sale. 7. We may als .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nature of trade. In other words, the price paid is not decisive to say whether the land is agricultural or not. 7.1 We may refer to a judgment of the Hon ble Madras High Court in the case of CWT vs. E. Udayakumar (2006) 284 ITR511 (Mad) where the Hon ble Madras High Court has referred to the decision of the Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Smt. Savita Rani (2004) 186 CTR (P&H) 240 : (2004) 270 ITR 40 (P&H) and has observed and held as under : "8. It is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of her share in 23 karnals, 17 marlas land during the financial year 1990-91, relevant to the asst. yr. 1991-92, the sale was effected by three registered sale deeds. While filing her return of income, she claimed exemption from levy of capital gains under s. 54B of the Act on the ground that the land sold by her was agricultural land and the sale proceeds were invested in the purchase of agricultural land within two years. The AO rejected the claim of the assessee holding that the land sold by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment showed that the assessee had declared agricultural income from this land in her returns for the preceding two years. The land being located in commercial area or the land having been partially utilised for non-agricultural purposes or that the vendees had also purchased it for nonagricultural purposes, were totally irrelevant consideration for the purposes of application of s. 54B. 10. It is seen from the aforesaid decision that the agricultural land sold by the assessee with an intent to p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e facts of the present case, the land in question is classified in the Revenue records as agricultural land and there is no dispute regarding this issue and actual cultivation has been carried on this land and income was declared from this land in the return of income filed by the assessee for the earlier years as agricultural income. It is also an admitted fact that the assessee has not applied for conversion of this agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes and the assessee has not put t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sions of State Government. If by a Government Notification, the nature and character of land changes from agriculture into non-agriculture then there is no question of conversion of this land for non- agricultural purposes by the Revenue authorities concerned. The land owners are required to apply to the concerned Revenue authorities for the purpose of conversion of the agricultural land into nonagricultural land and there is no automatic conversion in this case. 7.4 It is also an admitted posit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tural purposes would not change the character of the agricultural land into non-agricultural land at the relevant point of time when the land was sold by the assessee. It is also an admitted position that the assessee had not applied for conversion of the land in question into nonagricultural purposes and no such permissions were obtained from the concerned authority. In the Revenue records, the land is classified as agricultural land and has not been changed from agricultural land to nonagricul .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sees have put the land in use for non- agricultural purposes has been brought on record. The nature of the crop and the person who cultivated the land are duly mentioned in the assessment order shows that at the relevant point of time the land was used for agricultural purposes only and nothing is brought on record to show that the land was put in use for non-agricultural purposes by the assessees. In view of the decision of the Hon ble High Court in the case of Gopal C. Sharma vs. CIT (209 ITR .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ame had been altered with passage of time. Thus, the fact that the land in question in the instant case is bought by Developer cannot be a determining factor by itself to say that the land was converted into use for non-agricultural purposes. 7.5 Recently the Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT vs. Madhukumar N. (HUF) (2012) 78 DTR (Kar) 391 held as follows: "9. An agricultural land in India is not a capital asset but becomes a capital asset if it is the land located under Section 2(14) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ection 2(14)(iii) of the Act, but also requires the fulfilment of the condition that the Central Government has issued a notification under this Clause for the purpose of including the area up to 8 kms, from the municipal limits, to render the land as a Capital Asset. 11. In the present case, it is not in dispute that the subject land is not located within the limits of Dasarahalli City Municipal Council therefore, Clause (a) to section 2(14][iii] of the Act is not attracted. 12. However, though .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arrived at by the Tribunal is nevertheless the correct conclusion." 7.7 Further the Kolkata Bench of the Tribunal in the case ofDCIT vs. ArijitMitra (48 SOT 544) (Kol) held as follows: "7. From the above, it is clear that agricultural land situated in areas lying within a distance not exceeding 8 km from the local limits of such Municipalities or Cantonment Boards are covered by the amended definitions of capital asset , if such areas are, having regard to the extent of and scope for t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the outer limits of any such municipality or cantonment board etc., still continues to be excluded from the definition of capital asset . Accordingly, in view of sub-clause (b) of section 2(14)(iii) of the Act even under the amended definition of expression capital asset , the agricultural land situated in rural areas continues to be excluded from that definition. And as in the present case, admittedly, the agricultural land of the assessee is outside the Municipal Limits of Rajarhat Municipalit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

shed. The cross objection of the assessee is allowed." 7.8 It was held in the case of CIT vs. Manilal Somnath (106ITR 917) as follows: Under the Income-tax Act of 1961, agricultural lend situated in India was excluded from the definition of " capital asset" and any gain from the sale thereof was not to be included in the total income of an assessee tinder the head "capital gains". In order to determine whether a particular land is agricultural land or not one has to firs .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he facts of each case. The assessee, Hindu, undivided family, had obtained some land on a partition in 1939. From that time, up to the time of its sale, agricultural operations were carried on in the land. There was no regular road to the land and it was with the aid of a tractor that agricultural operations were being carried on.The land was included within a draft town planning scheme. The assessee got permission of the Collector to sell the land for residential purposes and sold it.On the que .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urposes for a long time and nothing had happened till the date of the sale to change that character of the land. The potential nonagricultural value of the land for which a purchaser may be prepared to pay a large price would not detract from its character as agricultural land at the date of the sale. The land in question was, therefore, agricultural land. 7.9 Further the word "Capital Asset is defined in Section 2(14) to mean property of any kind held by an assessee, whether or not connect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed before the first day of the previous year; or (b) in any area within such distance, not being more than eight kilometres, from the local limits of any municipality or cantonment board referred to in item (a), as the Central Government may, having regard to the extent of, and scope for, urbanization of that area and other relevant considerations, specify in this behalf by notification in the Official Gazette; 8. It is very clear from the above that the gain on sale of an agricultural land woul .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n clearly provided that the authority referred to in clause (a) was only municipality. 8.1 We also perused the meaning of the term local authority as referred in section 10(20) of the Act. (20) the income of a local authority which is chargeable under the head "Income from house property", "Capital gains" or "Income from other sources" or from a trade or business carried on by it which accrues or arises from the supply of a commodity or service [(not being water or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment with, the control or management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924); 8.2 It is also evident from the Memorandum explaining the provisions of Finance Act, 1970, whereby s. 2(14) was amended so as to include the agricultural lands located within the jurisdiction of a municipality in the definition of the expression 'Capital Asset'. The relevant portion of the said memorandum is reproduced hereunder: &q .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nment board and which has a population of not less than ten thousand persons according to the last preceding census for which the relevant figures have been published before the first day of the previous year. The Central Government has been authorised to notify in the Official Gazette any area outside the limits of any municipality or cantonment board having a population of not less than ten thousand up to a maximum distance of 8 kilometres from such limits, for the purposes of this provision. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

entral Government from the limits of any such municipality or cantonment board, will continue to be excluded from the term "capital asset". 8.3 Further it is nobody's case that the property falls within any area which is comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality or cantonment board or which has a population of not less than 10,000 according to the last preceding Census of which the relevant figures have been published before the first day of the previous year. In other wo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d scope for, urbanisation of that area and other relevant considerations, specify in this behalf by notification in the Official Gazette. 8.4 We have carefully gone through the notification issued by the Central Government u/s. 2(1A)(c) proviso (ii)(B) and 2(14)(3b) vide No. 9447 (F. No. 164/(3)/87/ITA-I) dated 6th January, 1994 as amended by notification No. 11186 dated 28th December, 1999. In the schedule annexed to the notification dated 6.1.1994, entry is relating to Chennai wherein mentione .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

situation in rural areas, areas outside the Municipality or cantonment board etc., having a population of not less than 10,000 and also beyond the distance notified by Central Government from local limits i.e. the outer limits of any such municipality or cantonment board etc., still continues to be excluded from the definition of 'capital asset'. Accordingly, in view of sub-clause (b) of section 2(14)(iii) of the Act even under the amended definition of expression 'capital asset' .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, no capital gain tax can be charged on the sale transaction of this land entered by the assessee. This is supported by the order of Kolkata Bench of this Tribunal in the case of ArijitMitra (cited supra), Harish V. Milani (supra) and M.S. SrinivasNaicker vs. ITO (292 ITR 481) (Mad). By borrowing the meaning from the above section, we are not able to appreciate that the land falls within the territorial limit of any municipality without notification of Central Government as held by the Karnatak .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ubsequently formed may be taken into account, it is the intention at the inception is crucial. One of the essential elements in an adventure of the trade is the intention to trade; that intention must be present at the time of purchase. The mere circumstances, that a property is purchased in the hope that when sold later on it would leave a margin of profit, would not be sufficient to show, an intention to trade at the inception. In a case where the purchase has been made solely and exclusively .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version