Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Amarjit Singh Versus Kuljinder Singh

2016 (9) TMI 766 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Dishonoring of cheque - Committing an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Held that:-When the cheque was bounced, on account of closure of account by the petitioner, the respondent had served a legal notice upon him before filing the present complaint, but the petitioner did not reply to the said notice. In order to invoke Section 138 of the act, the three ingredients which need to be fulfilled are (i) that there is a legal enforceable debt; (ii) that the cheque w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

verable debt is not a matter of presumption under Section 139 of the Act. Rather, it merely raises a presumption in favour of the holder of the cheque that the same has been issued for discharge of any debt or liability. Thus, ingredients of Section 138 of the Act have duly been met, as the accused was unable to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Act. - Even otherwise, the petitioner has himself suffered a statement before the lower Appellate Court that a compromise has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a is altogether a new plea and the same is not admissible at this stage. Once the petitioner has made a statement that he will make the payment within a specified period and has failed to honour the same, he is estopped from raising altogether a new plea at this stage. - Criminal Revision No.2036 of 2016 (O&M) - Dated:- 13-7-2016 - MR. HARI PAL VERMA, J. For The Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Kahlon, Advocate HARI PAL VERMA, J. Petitioner has filed the present revision petition challenging the judgment d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of ₹ 2,000/-. Briefly stated, respondent-Kuljinder Singh filed a complaint against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Act and Section 420 IPC, with the allegations that the petitioner has borrowed a sum of ₹ 2,30,000/- from the respondent-complainant in the month of March, 2012 for his personal need. The petitioner had agreed to pay back the said amount within one month and in order to discharge his legal liability, he had issued a postdated cheque, in favour of the respondent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

However, the petitioner did not make the payment of the cheque amount in question, giving a cause of action to the respondent-complainant to file the present complaint. Petitioner was summoned under Section 138 of the Act and notice of accusations for commission of offence under Section 138 was also served upon him. The petitioner did not plead guilty and rather, claimed trial. The respondent himself stepped into the witness box as CW-1 and reiterated the averments made in the complaint in his a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on:- 1. Whether accused has issued a cheque for a sum of ₹ 2,30,000/- dated 17.04.2012 drawn on ICICI Bank Branch Phagwara in favour of the complainant in discharge of his legal liability or not? 2. Whether said cheque on presentation returned back dishonoured with the remarks Account closed and despite the issuance of legal notice accused failed to make the payment of the cheque amount within statutory period or not? The petitioner referred to the cross-examination of CW-1 Kuljinder Singh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt dated 7.8.2012 held the petitioner guilty for commission of offence under Section 138 of the Act and sentenced him, as mentioned in the opening para of the judgment. Aggrieved from the aforesaid judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court, the petitioner filed an appeal before learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar. However, the said appeal was dismissed with the following observations:- 13. The cheque Ex.C2 dated 17.4.2012 is for an amount of ₹ 2,30,000/-. When .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

court on 18.4.2016 that a compromise has been effected between him and respondent/complainant for an amount of ₹ 1,30,000/- on today itself i.e. 16.5.2016 and make the payment of remaining amount of ₹ 1,00,000/- after one and half month from 16.5.2016, but today he has not brought even a single penny as per the compromise dated 18.4.2016. 14. In this way he admitted regarding issuance of the cheque Ex.C2, which ultimately dishonoured with remarks Account Closed . Hence, the trial co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t, it is the duty of the Court to see whether or not the complainant has discharged his initial burden as to existence of enforceable debt. He further argued that the complainant-respondent was not holding money lending licence and therefore, he is legally deprived of recovering the aforesaid loan amount in the absence of his disclosure in the income tax returns. Thus, the petitioner was not liable to be proceeded against under Section 138 of the Act. Learned counsel further argued that the peti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly to the said notice. In order to invoke Section 138 of the act, the three ingredients which need to be fulfilled are (i) that there is a legal enforceable debt; (ii) that the cheque was drawn from the account of the bank for discharge in whole or in part of any debt or other liability which presupposes a legally enforceable debt and (iii) that the cheque so issued had been returned due to insufficiency of funds. The proviso appended to the said Section provides for compliance of legal requirem .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version