Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Dr. Mahesh B. Patel Versus DCIT, Cir. 5, Baroda.

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - difference of opinion about the recognisation of income or expenditure - Held that:- AO did not find any factual inaccuracy in the details of the assessee. The only difference in the stand of the assessee and the AO was a difference of opinion about the recognisation of income or expenditure. The assessee has been accounting the expenditure on mercantile basis and recognizing the income on cash basis. Such type of method is not permissible in law, but it was not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a, Sr.DR ORDER The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the ld.CIT(A)-1, Vadodara dated 16.12.2015 passed for the Asstt.Year 2008-09. 2. Solitary grievance of the assessee is that the ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming the penalty of ₹ 3,47,727/- which was imposed by the ld.AO under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed his return of income on 30.9.2008 declaring an income at ₹ 38,88,470/-. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rcantile system of accountancy and for income he has been following cash system. The ld.AO has made reference to section 145 of the Income Tax Act and observed that sub-section 1 of section 145 prohibits the assessee to follow mix accounting system. The income was to be computed either cash or mercantile system of accounting. Accordingly, the ld.AO made addition of ₹ 9,84,329/- and ₹ 1,41,000/-. The finding of the AO reads as under: 5. Hence, sundry creditors and salary payable of &# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tialed for furnishing of inaccurate (Addition : ₹ 9,84,329/-) 6. On perusal of the submission it was found that the assessee has made payment to Natwarlal N Suthar, Vishwas Construction exceeding ₹ 20,000/- in a day or Gross 50,000/- for Repairs and Maintenance but he has not made TDS on these payments. In addition to this the Assessee has also made payment of ₹ 65,000/- to D Seven advertising for advertisement in Gujarat Samachar but not deducted TDS. The assessee was show cau .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r.w.s. Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. After hearing the assessee, the ld.AO has imposed penalty of ₹ 3,47,727/-. Appeal to the ld.CIT(A) did not bring any relief to the assessee. 5. The ld.counsel for the assessee contended that penalty was initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, whereas, it has been imposed for concealing of income. On the strength of Hon ble Karnataka High Court decision in the case of CIT Vs. Manjunath Cotton & Ginning Factory, 359 ITR .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the penalty order would indicate that the ld.AO has imposed penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars. He has not imposed penalty for concealment of income. The AO has observed that the assessee has tried to evade tax by furnishing inaccurate particulars of income which lead to concealment of income. Thus, there is no confusion in the mind of the AO. I do not find any merit in the first fold of submission raised by the ld.counsel for the assessee. 6. In the next fold of submissions, it was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sentatives, we gone through the record carefully. Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has direct bearing on the controversy. Therefore, it is pertinent to take note of the section. "271. Failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc. (1) The Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) or the CIT in the course of any proceedings under this Act, is satisfied that any person (a) and (b)** ** ** (c) has concealed the particulars of his income or furni .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

benefits: Explanation 1- Where in respect of any facts material to the computation of the total income of any person under this Act, (A) Such person fails to offer an explanation or offers an explanation which is found by the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) or the CIT to be false, or (B) such person offers an explanation which he is not able to substantiate and fails to prove that such explanation is bona fide and that all the facts relating to the same and material to the compu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uld be satisfied, that the assessee has; (i) concealed his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. As far as the quantification of the penalty is concerned, the penalty imposed under this section can range in between 100% to 300% of the tax sought to be evaded by the assessee, as a result of such concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The other most important features of this section is deeming provisions regarding concealment of income. The section not only co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion or the explanation offered by the assessee is found to be false by the Assessing Officer or Learned CIT(Appeal); and, (b) where in respect of any fact, material to the computation of total income under the provisions of the Act, the assessee is not able to substantiate the explanation and the assessee fails, to prove that such explanation is bona fide and that the assessee had disclosed all the facts relating to the same and material to the computation of the total income. Under first situa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version