Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Income-tax Officer, JR, Ward-2 (3) , Porbandar Versus D.R. Garments (India) Pvt. Ltd.

2016 (1) TMI 1128 - ITAT RAJKOT

Addition on account of disallowance of quality claim expenses - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- It is not even in dispute that the quality claim were made. As for the Assessing Officer’s stand that in view of debit note sent by the buyer, the assessee should have reduced its sale and only shown the net figure of sales, we find that whether gross sales is shown on the credit side, with a quality claim shown on the debit side, or whether a net sale figure is shown effect is the same. His .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f loan against receivables from foreign buyers are sometimes termed as FDBP (Foreign Documentary Bills Purchased), these are essentially nature of loans to exporters. Nothing, therefore, turns on the receipt of loans in respect of bills raised by the assessee. These are not revenue receipts at all, nor was it ever the case of even the Assessing Officer, on the light of these discussions, we approve the well reasoned of the CIT(A) and decline to interfere in the matter. - Decided against revenue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of ₹ 2,90,20,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of disallowance of quality claim expenses. 3. Learned representatives fairly agree that whatever we decide on Assessing Officer s appeal for the assessment year 2008-09 in this assessee s case, which was heard along with this appeal, will equally apply for this appeal as well. All the material facts and circumstances are the same. 4. Vide our order of even date, we have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in liabilities. Here is a case in which the claim is quantified but even in a situation the claim is not quantified but only reasonably estimated the deduction is admissible. As observed by Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. Vs. CIT [(2000) 245 ITR 428 (SC)], The law is well settled; if a business liability has definitely arisen in the accounting year, the deduction should be allowed although the liability may have to quantified and discharged at a later date. What sho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version