Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

LGW Limited Versus Union of India & Others

2016 (9) TMI 983 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Disallowance of rebate - goods manufactured by SAIL were exported - petitioner had allegedly committed procedural lapses which was condoned on the earlier occasion - validity of Revision order under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Held .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

signment under consideration have also not been alluded to or identified. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside. - Decided in favour of petitioner - W. P. No. 567 of 2009 - Dated:- 15-9-2016 - Debangsu Basak, J. For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhratos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ision under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner has submitted that, the revisional authority had failed to appreciate that, the revisional authority in an earlier consignment has negated the conten .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Excise were dealt with in respect of the earlier consignment by the revisional authority, against the department. That being the position, the impugned order ought to be set aside. Learned Advocate for the department has submitted that, the petition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rival contentions of the parties and the materials made available on record. The first petitioner is a merchant exporter. It had submitted claims for rebate in respect of goods exported to Bangladesh. Apparently, the petitioner had exported diverse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t, the goods exported by the respondents were manufactured by the Steel Authority of India Limited and was cleared on payment of Central Excise Duty. It has also noted that, relevant ARE forms bear the Customs endorsement to the effect that, the good .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

present case also, the goods manufactured by SAIL were exported. The petitioner had applied for rebate. The rebate was disallowed. Against the order disallowing the rebate, the petitioner had filed an appeal. The appeal was allowed by the Commissione .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version