Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Cadbury India Limited Versus C.C.E., Indore

2016 (9) TMI 1053 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Imposition of penalty - inadmissible availment/utilization of Cenvat credit in the name of Baddi unit - documents issued by the head office and Baddi branch as distributor of services - Baddi was a tax free zone and therefore, goods manufactured by the assessee in their Baddi unit were exempted from payment of duty - appellant paid inadmissible credit voluntarily - Held that:- the assessee had deposited the amount only when based on specific information , the Department caught them. Had there be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

08 (9) TMI 52 - SUPREME COURT]. - Decided against the appellant - Excise Appeal Nos.2564, 2565, 2566 of 2008 - Final Order No.53067-53069/2016 - Dated:- 17-8-2016 - Mr. Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra, President and Mr. Ashok K. Arya , Technical Member Present Shri Purshottam Jha, Advocate for the appellants Present Shri Yogesh Agarwal, A.R. for the respondent ORDER The present appeals have been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 30.7.2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central E .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d availed cenvat credit on the strength of documents issued by their head office and branches as distributor of services. The assessee had branches at Malapur and Baddi , H.P. It may be mentioned that at the relevant time, Baddi was a tax free zone and therefore, goods manufactured by the assessee in their Baddi unit were exempted from payment of duty. Therefore, the services availed in respect of Baddi Unit are not eligible for distribution of cenvat credit from the head office/branches which a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not arise. The assessee s Baddi unit wrongly distributed the inadmissible credit to Malanpur unit during the period of June 2005 to September 2005; October 2005 to March 2006 and April 2006 to March 2007 totalling to the tune of ₹ 2,53,51,829/-. In other words, in the name of Baddi unit, the apellant had availed/utilized inadmissible cenvat credit. When the Department caught the appellant, then they paid inadmissible credit of ₹ 2,43,51,829/- and claimed that payment was made volunta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version