Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Cords Cable Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Jaipur-I

2016 (9) TMI 1126 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Exemption Notification No. 6/2006 dated 01.03.2006 read with Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. dated 01.03.2002 - availment of benefit - supply of electric wires and cables under international competitive bidding to various thermal power plants without payment of duty - exemption denied on the ground that classification against Sl. No. 400 in Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. is indicated as 9801 whereas the wires and cables manufactured and cleared by the appellants are classifiable under CETH 8544. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r that the denial of the exemption to the appellant is not legally sustainable. Admittedly, the condition stipulated for exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE has been fulfilled by the appellant except for the classification in column-2 of Entry No. 400 in Customs Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. As clearly noted, the classification 9801 is not available in Central Excise Tariff and the same relates to project import, as such the denial of exemption on this grounds is legally not sustainable. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ere supplying the said dutiable items under international competitive bidding to various thermal power plants without payment of duty availing exemption under Notification No. 6/2006 dated 01.03.2006 read with Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. dated 01.03.2002. The exemption availed by the appellant was sought to be denied by the Revenue on the ground that the classification against Sl. No. 400 in Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. is indicated as 9801 whereas the wires and cables manufactured and cleare .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e supplied against international competitive bidding. The notification has condition No. 19 which is to be satisfied by the appellant. The said condition stipulates that the goods should be exempted from the duties of customs leviable under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the said Act when imported into India. Exemption to custom duty has been provided vide Sl. No. 400 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. However, in the said not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ates issued by competent authority. All the Conditions of Sl. No. 400 of customs notification has been fulfilled. The classification given under custom notification is not for a particular item by description but refers to project imports. In other words, the import item is identified by its usage rather than by its nature. Ld. Counsel relied on the decision of this Tribunal in Paramount Communication Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur-I vide Final Order No. 52166-52167/ 2016-Ex (DB) dated 23.06.2016 wherein .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version