Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Flaktwoods Acs (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & S.T., Noida-II

2016 (9) TMI 1173 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

Valuation - includability - freight incurred in transportation of goods manufactured - post clearance from the factory to the place or site of the buyers - Held that:- it is evident that the goods have been delivered to the buyer at the factory gate as is evident from the invoice and the purchase Orders by reading together. In the invoices, the appellants have charged sales tax and have also reflected the freight separately in most of the cases. Further, it is an admitted fact that in most of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

)(b). We hold that the valuation shall be done in the appellants case only under Section 4(1)(a), as explained by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of C.C.E. Mumbai Vs. Official Liquidator for Brimco Plastic Machinery Pvt. Ltd. [2015 (10) TMI 2281 - SUPREME COURT]. - Decided in favour of appellant with consequential relief - E/70132/2016-EX[DB] - Final Order No.70634/2016 - Dated:- 4-8-2016 - Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) and Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) Shri Rajesh Chibber .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

place or site of the buyers. 2. The brief facts are that the show-cause-notice dated 08.08.2014, was issued for the extended period from 2009-10 to 2013-14, alleging that the Revenue Audit pointed out that as per the relevant purchase order in invoices, the appellant have supplied their goods namely, Air Handling Unit, in complete knock-down condition to the premises of buyer. Appellants have assembled the AHU, and after that they have. installed the Unit at the buyers premises and the work of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s remained with the appellant till delivery and installation of the AHU at the buyer's premises. Accordingly, the place of removal of goods in terms of Section 4(1) of the Act, is the buyer's premises. Further, on scrutiny of Ledgers and invoices of the appellant, it was found that the appellant has been discharging freight on the AHU from their unit upto the premises of buyers, but they are not including the freight in the assessable value of AHU. Accordingly, it appeared to Revenue tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is includible in the assessable value or not. 4. The facts, which are not in dispute, is that the appellant manufactured most of the components of the AHU. Some components are bought and brought in the factory and used in the manufacture of AHU, which is cleared on payment of duty. The learned Counsel for the appellants has taken us through some of the purchase orders, wherein one purchase order of Gland Pharma Ltd. dated 06.12.2012, the terms of delivery is mentioned as F.O.R. at their site. Fu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dispatch, 10% after delivery and subject to performance BG for one year. Further, in the delivery terms, it is mentioned freight at actual. Similarly, in the purchase order of NTPC Ltd., under the column of inspection, it is mentioned NTPC shall collect the material from vendor's premises and freight charges, it is mentioned will be borne by NTPC and further providing for inspection at source-Dadari (i.e. workshop of the appellant). Accordingly, learned Counsel, Mr. Rajesh Chibber urged tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ample invoices, that freight have been charged separately in the invoices. The counsel is also relying on the ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of C.C.E. Mumbai Vs. Official Liquidator for Brimco Plastic Machinery Pvt. Ltd., reported at 2015(09) LCX 0057, wherein also the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of the assessee, manufacturing and clearing Plastic Machinery and installing and commissioning it at the factory sites of their customers, and most of the components of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue wanted to add certain cost incurred towards installation, erection, etc. for arriving at the transaction value. The apex Court held that the Tribunal was correct in holding that the expenses of installation is not includible in the transaction value, as it is obvious conclusion on reading of Section 4 of the Act. As per which, the transaction value is to be arrived at the time of clearance of the goods at the factory gate. All the expenses which are incurred post clearance (that too, after th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version