Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Quantum Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Dy. Comm. Of Income-tax, Circle -1 (3) , Mumbai

Disallowance of marketing and distribution fee paid to QIEF Management LLC, Mauritius - Held that:- The invoking of section 40A(2)(b) of the Act to disallow a portion of the expenditure in assessment year 2012-13 does not lend any support to the inference of the CIT(A) that the expenditure has not been made wholly and exclusively for the purpose of assessee’s business because what is envisaged by section 40A(2)(b) is to disallow an expenditure which is found to be unreasonable or excessive in re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Assessing Officer in the remand report as well as in the assessment for assessment year 2012- 13. The said burden, in our view, has not been discharged by the CIT(A) in the present case and, therefore, we are unable to acquiesce to the same. As a consequence, we hereby set-aside the order of the CIT(A) on this aspect and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition representing payment made to QIEF for marketing support services. - Disallowance of advertisement expenditure - whether .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has a deep interest, may it be the affairs of the Asset Management Company or the Mutual Fund. No doubt, the advertisements are intended to secure investors for investing in the schemes of the Mutual Fund, which is a separate entity, so however, the incurrence of such expenditure vis-à-vis assessee’s business cannot be discounted even if its incurrence would result in a benefit to a third party. There can be no gain saying that-better the performance of the Mutual Fund and the Asset Management C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted by the Revenue and, therefore, on this limited point itself we find no reason to uphold invoking of Sec. 14A of the Act by CIT(A) in this year in order to disallow the impugned expenditure on advertisement. - Disallowance for ‘ brand building’ expenditure - complete newspaper cuttings of advertisements not having been filed - Held that:- As we find no specific determination by CIT(A) on this aspect. In any case, we find that before the CIT(A), assessee had assailed the aforesaid position .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ofar as the nonfurnishing of some of the newspaper cuttings is concerned, before the CIT(A) assessee had explained it properly and we find that there are no credible reasons to disbelieve the assessee on this aspect, as the sample newspaper cuttings clearly support the invoices raised by M/s. Hansa Vision Pvt. Ltd. - In conclusion, having regard to the aforesaid discussion, we deem it fit and proper to set-aside the order of CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

out of an order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act ) dated 20/03/2014. 2. In this appeal assessee has raised the following Grounds of Appeal:- 1:0 Re.: Disallowance of ₹ 3,26,05,268/- paid to QIEF Management LLC for 'marketing support services': I :I The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) has erred in holding that the marketing and distribution fees paid by the Appellant during the year to QIEF Management LLC are no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se why the said disallowance should not be made. I : 4 The Appellant submits that considering the facts and circumstances of its case and the law prevailing on the subject the marketing and distribution fee i incurred by it wholly and exclusively for the purpose of its business and the stand taken by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) is misconceived, erroneous and not in accordance with law. I:5 The Appellant submits that the Assessing Officer be directed to allow the marketing and distri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed in making various erroneous and unsubstantiated observations (which ignore the facts submitted before him and/or are contrary to the facts on record) in the impugned Order to buttress his stand vis-a-vis the disallowance of marketing and development fees. 2:3 The Appellant submits that considering the facts and circumstances of its case and the law prevailing on the subject the advertising expenditure incurred by the Appellant was revenue in nature and was incurred wholly and exclusively for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by him and to re-compute its total income and tax thereon accordingly. 3. As a perusal of the aforesaid Grounds of appeal reveal, appellant has raised two issues, which we shall deal in seriatim. The appellant is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is carrying on the business as SEBI registered Portfolio Manager and Advisory Services. For the assessment year under consideration, it filed return of income declaring a total income of ₹ 29,65,75,840/-, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

QEIF ). On being asked by the Assessing Officer to justify such expenditure, assessee had explained that the payment was made for marketing and distribution services rendered by QIEF and since the payee did not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, such amounts were not taxable in India. The Assessing Officer however, noted that since QIEF was a group concern; its directors are residents in India; and, QIEF operates an administrative back-office in India and, therefore, QIEF has a PE in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ity of section 40(a)(i) of the Act, instead he has retained the disallowance on a different ground. As per the CIT(A), the impugned expenditure does not qualify for deduction under section 37(1) of the Act. The reasons which weighed with the CIT(A) to hold so can be summarized as follows. Firstly, according to CIT(A), assessee had failed to demonstrate that the infrastructure available with QIEF was sufficient to canvass business on behalf of the assessee in Europe or in any other part of the wo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7(1) of the Act . By relying on the ratio of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lachminarayan Madan Lal Vs. CIT, 86 ITR 439(SC) he observed that it was open for the Revenue to examine the relevant factors and determine allowability of expenditure under section 37(1) of the Act. According to him, the factors in the present case show that the amounts have not been laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business, and he retained the disallowance, albeit on a di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to be canvassed that the US subsidiary of QIEF had on its rolls one Mr. Arvind Rangarajan, based in America, whose profile demonstrates expertise in India-related research and investment efforts. Apart therefrom, it has also been pointed out that Page 339 of the Paper Book contains a list of clients referred by QIEF alongwith the corresponding fees earned by the assessee from such clients, which clearly demonstrates that a substantial portion of assessee s income is on account of clients referr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Representative for the assessee pointed out that the aforesaid material was very much before the lower authorities and there was no justification to disbelieve the same and hold that the requisite services were not provided by QIEF to the assessee. It was also canvassed that the agreement between assessee and QIEF has been duly acted upon and, therefore, it cannot be disbelieved by the Revenue and in this regard reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon ble Calcutta High Court in the case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s revenues for 31/12/2010 amounted to USD 56,63,538/-, out of which the impugned marketing fee of USD 22,55,952 has been received from assessee company. By referring to relevant notes on Page 260 of the Paper Book it is sought to be pointed out that QIEF had entered into Fund development agreement with Celerity Venture LLC, a Delaware Limited liability company and the assessee company, under which the interests and obligations of Celerity Venture LLC were assigned to the assessee-company. Thus, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee. 6. On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative appearing for the Revenue has primarily reiterated the arguments taken by the CIT(A), which we have already adverted to in an earlier para, and are not being repeated for the sake of brevity. According to the Ld. Departmental Representative, the CIT(A) has denied the deduction under section 37(1) of the Act primarily for the reason that assessee could not establish rendering of services by QIEF to the assessee company on the basi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

wed under section 40(a)(i) of the Act. This position did not find favour with the CIT(A) as according to him tax was not required to be deducted at source on the impugned amount, as it was not liable to be taxed in India in the hands of QIEF. On this aspect of the matter, there is no appeal preferred by the Revenue and, therefore, such finding of CIT(A) has attained finality. Therefore, we proceed to examine the basis on which the CIT(A) has sustained the disallowance. As per the CIT(A) the expe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ility of infrastructure with QIEF, in our view, the CIT(A) has merely brushed aside the material and evidence which the assessee sought to put-forth before him. In Para 1.13(a) of the order, the CIT(A) observes that assessee had failed to show the infrastructure available with QIEF to render services to assesseecompany. Such an observation by the CIT(A) is a bland assertion because the material which was before him, and which has also been placed in the Paper Book filed before us, clearly shows .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ents such as sovereign funds, pension fund, etc. in relation to their investment exposures in India-listed securities. Ostensibly, such institutional clients would require appropriate and diligent evaluation of their Investment Manager and for that purpose assessee had undertaken marketing efforts through QIEF. In terms of the agreement with QIEF, the said concern was tasked to look for potential opportunities and to market the capabilities and experience of the assessee-company on India-focused .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ds, pension funds, etc. in Europe, Middle East and Asia and also to private sector institutional clients in USA. In our considered opinion, the assertions which have been made by the assessee before the lower authorities as well as before us are borne out of record inasmuch as assessee has earned income through clients referred by QIEF, which is not disputed. Much has been made out by the CIT(A) that mere existence of an agreement between asessee and QIEP would not ipso-facto lead to the allowab .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion, having regard to the material and evidence on record, the CIT(A) has sought to disregard the agreement on a mere hypothetical basis, without any factual support. 7.2 Before parting, we may mention two more aspects which were before the CIT(A) . In the course of the assessment proceedings, the only objection of the Assessing Officer was based on non-deduction of tax at source and in so far as the issue of section 37(1) of the Act was concerned, the Assessing Officer had no objection. It was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mal business activity by the assessee and hence deductible under section 37(1) of the Act. Thus, impliedly the Assessing Officer reiterated the stand taken in the assessment order on the issue of section 37(1) of the Act. Second aspect which needs mentions is the assessment made by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Act for the assessment year 2012-13, wherein a portion of the marketing support fee paid to QIEF was disallowed by invoking section 40A (2)(b) of the Act. As per the C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the stand of the CIT(A) is misdirected and is based on a wrong perspective. In fact, the invoking of section 40A(2)(b) of the Act to disallow a portion of the expenditure in assessment year 2012-13 does not lend any support to the inference of the CIT(A) that the expenditure has not been made wholly and exclusively for the purpose of assessee s business because what is envisaged by section 40A(2)(b) is to disallow an expenditure which is found to be unreasonable or excessive in relation to it s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ficer in the remand report as well as in the assessment for assessment year 2012- 13. The said burden, in our view, has not been discharged by the CIT(A) in the present case and, therefore, we are unable to acquiesce to the same. As a consequence, we hereby set-aside the order of the CIT(A) on this aspect and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of ₹ 3,26,05,268/- representing payment made to QIEF for marketing support services. Thus, on this aspect assessee succeeds. 8. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of payment to M/s. Hansa Vision Pvt. Ltd. for placing advertisements in newspapers. On being asked to justify the claim of advertisement expenses, assessee furnished the detail of expenditure, sample copies of invoices raised by M/s. Hansa Vision Pvt. Ltd. and also photocopies of newspaper cuttings evidencing the advertisements placed. Assessee also explained that the advertisement expense was incurred in its capacity as the sponsor of Quantum Mutual Fund on the media campaign to promote the var .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he expenditure was incurred for a group company and it was not allowable as a business expense in the hands of the assesseecompany. Before reaching to his ultimate conclusion, the Assessing Officer noted that the newspaper cuttings for the entire advertisement expenditure were not furnished; and, thus the entire claim of ₹ 3,77,14,278/- could not be said to be supported by documentary evidence. Further, the Assessing Officer observed that the advertisement expenditure was incurred by the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y; a confirmation from M/s. Hansa Vision Pvt. Ltd. was adduced as additional evidence by making application under Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962; an agreement entered with M/s. Hansa Vision Pvt. Ltd. dated 15.2.2011 was also adduced as additional evidence by way of an application under Rule 46A of the Rules; that the Assessing Officer could not have questioned the business decision of the assessee to incur the impugned advertisement expenditure; that the non-filing of newspaper cuttings .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mstances it could not be said that the expenditure was incurred for brand building ; that the name of the assessee was appearing in the newspaper advertisements as sponsor of the Mutual Fund and therefore it could not be said that the advertisements did not reflect the name of assessee-company; and, lastly that even if it was to be held that the expenditure was made for a group concern, it was pointed that the assessee-company had a direct interest in the business of the Quantum Asset Management .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

29 vi) S.A. Builders v/s CIT [2007] 158 Taxman 74 to say that an expenditure incurred for the purposes of business is allowable even if some benefit arises to a third party. Apart from relying on the aforesaid decisions, assessee also relied on the following decisions for the proposition that the nature of the impugned advertisement expenditure could not be construed as having been incurred for brand building :- i) ACIT v/s Global Healthline (P) Ltd. [2012] 19 ITR(T) 298 ii) ITO v/s Spice Commun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and called for a Remand report from the Assessing Officer on various issues, including the application of the assessee seeking admission of additional evidences under Rule 46A of the Rules. In response, the Assessing Officer submitted that M/s. Hansa Vision Pvt. Ltd. had raised all the invoices in the months of February and March, 2011 and even the agreement was dated 15.2.2011, which was towards the fag end of the year, which appeared to be doubtful. Secondly, the Assessing Officer submitted t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al Fund itself and not by the assessee-company acting as a sponsor. In sum and substance, the Assessing Officer reiterated his earlier position and also opposed the plea of the assessee for admission of additional evidence. It is noticed from the order of CIT(A) that assessee also furnished its say on the Remand report submitted by the Assessing Officer, which has been reproduced by the CIT(A) in para 2.5 of his order. The CIT(A) considered the rival stands and concluded as follows. Firstly, on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

td. and thus, the action of incurring expenditure on promotion of various schemes of Quantum Mutual Fund was on relevant considerations. The CIT(A) declined to admit such an evidence as, according to him, the agreement did not pertain to the impugned assessment year as it was dated 1.6.2011. With regard to the merits, CIT(A) concluded that the expenditure did not qualify for deduction u/s 37(1) of the Act as it was not laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of assessee s business. 10. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an be considered to have been incurred for earning tax-free incomes and the same was not allowable u/s 14A of the Act. For the said reasons, he has affirmed the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer. 11. Before us, the learned representative for the assessee vehemently pointed out that the material on record clearly shows that the entire expenditure was incurred by the assessee for the purpose of attracting investors towards investing in the Quantum Mutual Fund, of which assessee was the sp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ebruary/March, 2011 and thereafter the incurrence of the advertisement expenditure started. In this manner, it was sought to be canvassed that incurrence of the expenditure towards the fag end of the year is not for any doubtful reasons , as made out by the lower authorities. Emphasizing that the expenditure was falling within the tests laid down in Sec. 37(1) of the Act, it was pointed out that the wholly owned subsidiary of the assessee-company, i.e., QAMC was managing the assets of Quantum Mu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

us standi of the assessee-company to incur such advertisement expenditure for attracting investors to invest in the Mutual Fund. In particular, attention was invited to Regulation 52(7) of SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulation, 1996 to emphasize that any expenditure in excess of the limits specified in the Regulations was liable to be borne only by the concerned Asset Management Company or by the Trustees or sponsors of the Mutual Fund. The learned representative explained that in view of the fact that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inted out that it was wrong on the part of the CIT(A) to have observed that the assesseecompany was entitled to earn only tax-exempt incomes from QAMC. In this context, reference was invited to the agreement dated 1.6.2011 with QAMC, a copy of which has been placed at pages 223 to 226 of the Paper Book, to show that assessee was entitled to earn Management fee also, which was a taxable receipt. The learned representative pointed out that the aforesaid crucial piece of evidence was put before the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as invited to the relevant clause in the agreement dated 1.6.2011. It was, therefore, contended that the refusal of the CIT(A) to consider such an evidence was on irrelevant considerations. Notwithstanding the aforesaid, the learned representative pointed out that Sec. 14A of the Act was of no relevance for the period under consideration inasmuch as there was no tax-free dividend income earned by the assessee from QAMC, as no dividend has been paid by QAMC at all. On this aspect, reliance was pl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s (P) Ltd., 35 Taxmann.com 210, order of Chennai Bench of Tribunal in the case of EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. (ITA No. 1503/Mds/2012 dated 17.7.2013), order of Mumbai Bench of Tribunal in the case of M/s. JM Financial Ltd. (ITA No. 4521/Mum/2012 dated 26.3.2014) and order of Delhi Bench of Tribunal in the case of Interglobe Enterprises Ltd. (ITA Nos. 1362 & 1032/Del/2013 dated 4.4.2014). For all the above reasons, the learned representative for the assessee submitted that the impugned expendi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ompany of the Mutual Fund and not by the assessee who was sponsor of the Fund. With regard to the earning of taxable Management fee from QAMC, the ld. DR pointed out that such income earned by the assessee over the years was less than the expenditure incurred by the assessee on advertisement, etc., and it would not defeat the invoking of Sec. 14A of the Act. According to him, the incomes that assessee was liable to earn in future on account of dividend and Long Term Capital Gain from QAMC were i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Quantum Mutual Fund as a sponsor in terms of SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996. A Mutual Fund is set-up in the form of a Trust, which has a sponsor, trustees, Asset Management Company and a Custodian. In terms of SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996 a sponsor is akin to a promoter of a corporate body as it is the sponsor who establishes a Mutual Fund and registers it under the SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996. In term of the SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996 it is the sponsor who form .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ortfolio of securities and instead, the same is done by an Asset Management Company in terms of SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996. The Asset Management Company thus manages the Fund s schemes and also its corpus. The Fund management includes buying and selling of securities in large volumes and in order to keep a track of such transactions, there is a Custodian. The aforesaid briefly brings out the schematic position of the assessee-company in the context of the complexities involved in the f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the business of the QAMC, who in turn manages the assets of Quantum Mutual Fund. The aforesaid factual matrix is not in dispute and is also emerging from record. Having regard to the same, the moot question is as to whether the assessee was driven by considerations of commercial expediency or not while incurring the impugned expenditure on advertisement? No doubt, the expression commercial expediency is not amenable to a straightjacketed definition, but its meaning is required to be understoo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd of commercial expediency. If we examine the impugned advertisement expenditure incurred by the assessee as a sponsor of the Mutual Fund and as a holding company for the Asset Management Company of the Mutual Fund, it could not be said that assessee was devoid of any locus standi. In fact, there can be no denying the fact that the purport of the expenditure was to increase assessee s own earnings inasmuch as the Management fee which the assessee is entitled to earn from QAMC is also dependent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ere is no nexus between the expenditure and the business of the assessee is quite fallacious and contrary to the fact-situation. At this stage, we may also refer to a concurrent stand of the Revenue that as the advertisements relate to securing investors to invest in the schemes of Quantum Mutual Fund, the expenditure, at best, could be said to be for the benefit of Quantum Mutual Fund, which is a separate taxable entity. Thus, as per the Revenue, such expenditure is for the benefit of a third p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the expression for the purposes of business in both the sections. The Hon'ble Supreme Court emphasized that even in the context of Sec. 37(1) of the Act, the expression for the purposes of business would include an expenditure voluntarily incurred for commercial expediency and it would be immaterial if a third party also benefitted from the same. The following extract from the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is notable:- …………. once it is established that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es of the assessee and see how a prudent businessman would act. The authorities must not look at the matter from their view point but that of a prudent businessman. In view of the aforesaid, we therefore do not find any merit in the stand of the income-tax authorities that the expenditure in question is not laid out for the purposes of assessee s business, merely because it could benefit another entity also. 15. We may also refer to the reliance placed by CIT(A) on the judgment of Hon'ble Su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stood on an entirely different footing. The assessee before the Hon'ble Supreme Court was a bulk shareholder in several companies and it was rendering services to its subsidiaries in various areas of finance, liaisoning, export promotion etc. The Directors of the subsidiary companies were earning remuneration from the respective companies in terms of the limits fixed under the Companies Act, 1956. The assessee-company paid remuneration to Directors of the subsidiary companies in excess of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

could be earned by the assessee without incurring the disputed expenditure. It is for the said reason the claim of the assessee was negated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. So however, in the present case, the complexion of the factual matrix is quite different. Herein, it is the assessee-company which has set-up the Mutual Fund as a sponsor and is also the holding company for the Asset Management Company, which in turn is managing the assets of the Mutual Fund. The income-earning apparatus of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the matter, the learned representative for the assessee relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Tata Sons (P) Ltd., 18 ITR 460 which has also been referred to by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Amalgamations (P) Ltd. (supra). In the case of Tata Sons (P) Ltd. (supra) assessee was managing agent of an another company and it was earning agency commission computed with reference to the net profits of the managed company. Assessee-company volunta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lgamations (P) Ltd. (supra) considered the judgment of Hon'ble Bombay High Court and observed that there was a direct nexus between the increased profits of the managed company and the managerial commission payable to the assessee since such agency commission was calculated as a prescribed percentage of the net profits of the managed company. In our considered opinion, the parity of reasoning in the case of Tata Sons (P) Ltd. (supra) is clearly attracted in the present case too. There can be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A of the Act, in our view, is also quite untenable. The said plea is based on the premise that the only possible earnings of the assessee as a sponsor of the Mutual Fund, and as a holding company of the Asset Management Company, by way of dividends or Long Term Capital Gain would be exempt from tax and, therefore, the impugned expenditure would constitute an expenditure incurred for earning of exempt income, which is hit by the provisions of Sec. 14A of the Act. Factually speaking, the said prem .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al evidence which hitherto was not before the Assessing Officer during the assessment proceedings. In our considered opinion, the said evidence has been unjustly disregarded by the CIT(A). A copy of the said agreement is placed in the Paper Book at pages 223 to 226 and it is averred therein that the same is governed by the terms and conditions approved by the Regional Director, Western Region, Mumbai under the proviso to Sec. 297(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. Such approval of the authority unde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oved by a statutory authority. Be that as it may, in our view, the aforesaid material was only in support of assessee s primary assertion that the expenditure was incurred on considerations of commercial expediency . In our considered opinion, the aforesaid piece of evidence was quite germane for the purposes of appreciating the entire transaction in its proper perspective, and the CIT(A) erred in not considering such material to decide the controversy before him. 17. In any case, on the issue o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version