Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise Versus M/s Dee Development Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

2016 (10) TMI 113 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT was right in holding the supplies made from DTA unit to SEZ developer/promoter as 'exports' entitled for the exceptions provided under Rule 6 (6) of the CENVAT Credit Rule 2004, Whether the Tribunal was right in applying th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

units in SEZs/ Developers of SEZ are exempted from payment of Central Excise Duties and Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT was correct in holding that the amendment to Rule 6(6)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 vide Notification No.50/2008 CE (N.T) dated: 31 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

notification only. - Held that:- as the issue raised in the present appeal has already been gone into by three different High Courts and the opinion expressed is against the revenue and in favour of the assessees, for the reasons assigned in thos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2016 - MR. RAJESH BINDAL AND MR. HARINDER SINGH SIDHU JJ. Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate for the Respondent. ORDER RAJESH BINDAL J The revenue is in appeal against the order dated 26.2.2013 passed by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s right in holding the supplies made from DTA unit to SEZ developer/promoter as 'exports' entitled for the exceptions provided under Rule 6 (6) of the CENVAT Credit Rule 2004? 2. Whether the Tribunal was right in applying the overriding effec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nits in SEZs/ Developers of SEZ are exempted from payment of Central Excise Duties? 3. Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT was correct in holding that the amendment to Rule 6(6)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 vide Notification No.50/2008 CE (N.T) dated: .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e notification only? 2. At the very outset, it was not disputed by learned counsel for the parties that identical issue was gone into by three different High Courts in Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Raipur Vs. M/s Steel Authority of In .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version