Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Fateh Lal @ Fanta Lal Versus State of Rajasthan & Others

2016 (10) TMI 142 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Seeking release on permanent parole on the ground that he has completed 14 years of sentence awarded to him including remission - offense under NDPS act - Held that:- The case of the petitioner is required to considered by the Central Government and the reasons which have been incorporated for denial of permanent parole that the convict has not deposited the fine amount of ₹ 1,00,000/-, is also not sustainable in law as on account of non-payment of fine, the convict served the additional s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ections issued by Division Bench of this Court in the case of Shambhu Dayal (2012 (3) TMI 564 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT) shall be taken into consideration and thereafter the prayer of the petitioner for grant of permanent parole may be decided strictly in accordance with Rules within a period of one month from the date of receipt of application from the respondent-State. - D. B. Civil (Parole) Writ Petition No. 3716/2016 - Dated:- 13-7-2016 - Gopal Krishan Vyas And G. R. Moolchandani, JJ. Mr. Vishn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o deposit the amount of fine to the tune of ₹ 1,00,000/- imposed upon by the learned trial court while convicting him for the offence Section 8/18 of the N.D.P.S. Act for ten years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of ₹ 1,00,000/-, with the default stipulation to undergo one year s additional simple imprisonment. The contention of the learned Public Prosecutor is that till consideration, the petitioner/convict did not deposit the amount of fine of ₹ 1,00,000/-, therefore, his p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

answering the question framed in the said parole petition: - 28. In view of the discussions made above, the two questions framed by this Court are answered in the following manner: - Question No. (1) (1) Whether the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 are applicable in the cases where sentence of imprisonment is for an offence relating to a matter to which executive power of Union extends such as under NDPS Act. Answer The Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules,1958 are not ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version