Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Smt. Mamta Gupta Versus The DCIT, Circle-1, Bhavnagar

2016 (10) TMI 159 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Allowability of deduction on account of ‘write off’ of bad debts - Held that:- Section 36(2)(i) of the Act allows deduction on account of satisfaction of any of one of the two conditions; namely (a) bad debts or part thereof taken into account in computing the income of the assessee for an earlier assessment year before such date or part thereof is ‘written off’ or (b) the debts represents money lend in the ordinary course of business of bank or money lending which is carried on by the assessee. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e us. Assessee has merely made a submission that the amount represents sale. Similarly, as far as the assessee’s claim of having given advance payment for purchase of raw-material of ₹ 11,56,495/- is concerned, no details of the same have been furnished by the assessee. Further, in the present case, assessee has not furnished details in support of its contention of having fulfilled the conditions specified u/s.36 of the Act for claiming deduction. - We find that Hon’ble Supreme Court i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unity to place on record about the satisfaction of the required conditions for claiming deduction of “write off”. We therefore restore the issue to the file of AO to decide the issue afresh - Decided in favour of assessee for statistical purposes. - I.T.A. No.915/Ahd/2012 - Dated:- 22-8-2016 - SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER And SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant by : Written submission For The Respondent : Shri James Kurian, Sr.DR ORDER PER SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUN .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

; 11,20,690/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and thereafter assessment was framed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") vide order dated 27/12/2010 and the total income was determined at ₹ 27,90,270/-. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer (AO), assessee carried the matter before the ld.CIT(A), who vide order dated 15/02/2012 (in Appeal No.CIT(A)/XX/614/10-11) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of ld .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llowed by the AO for the following reasons:- (i) Assessee did not file the details and according to AO the balances written off were with respect to the balances recoverable from the sister-concern of the assessee and assessee had not filed any proof of written off in the books of accounts. (ii) Though assessee had claimed that the party to whom the balance was receivable was closed since last 10 years but on perusal of the ledger , AO noticed that as on 1.4.2002 there was a brought forward bala .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 16,69,583/-. Aggrieved by the order of AO, assessee carried the matter before the ld.CIT(A), who dismissed the appeal of the assessee by observing as under:- 2.2. I have considered the submissions made by the A.R. of the appellant and the observations of the assessing officer in the assessment order. For the detailed reasons mentioned at para-5 of the assessment order, AO disallowed the balance written off in respect of M/s.Satyanaran Steel Rolling Mill. In the written submissions it is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

de advances, they never formed part of appellant s income in earlier years. Hence the provisions of Sec.36(2) are not satisfied. If the advances were capital in nature, since the appellant is not a money-lender, the loss cannot be revenue loss. Therefore, I do not see any merit in the contentions of the appellant. Impugned disallowance of ₹ 16,69,583/- is confirmed. This ground of appeal is dismissed. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the ld.CIT(A), assessee is now in appeal before us and has r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dited to profit & loss account and there is no need to further substantiate that besides copy of invoices and annual accounts of the relevant year. 4. Before us, in the written submissions assessee has submitted that the amount written off includes ₹ 5,13,088/- on account of sale of waste and scrap which could not be recovered by the assessee and the sales of which were credited in the books of accounts in earlier years. As far as the writing off of balances amount of ₹ 16,69,583 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orities including the Tribunal about the compliances of the conditions required for claiming deduction u/s.36(1)(vii) r.w.s. 36(2) of the Act. He thus supported the orders of the AO and ld.CIT(A). 5. We have heard the ld.Sr.DR, perused the material available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. The issue in the present case is with respect to allowability of deduction on account of write off of bad debts. Section 36(2)(i) of the Act allows deduction on account of satis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

first part of section 36(2)(i) of the Act is concerned, in the present case it is assessee s submission that the amount of ₹ 5,13,088/- represents the sale of waste and scrap which was credited to the P&L A/c. in the year of sale. We find that no details of the year of sale has been furnished by the assessee either before AO or ld.CIT(A) or before us. Assessee has merely made a submission that the amount represents sale. Similarly, as far as the assessee s claim of having given advanc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version