Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (10) TMI 241

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nts are waived in terms of Section 80 of the Act. Cenvat Credit availed on the basis of duty paid documents TR-6 Challans for the eligible period is upheld. - Decided partly in favor of assessee. - ST/ 1602/2011, ST /294/2011 & E/ 1825/2010 - Final Order No. 61069-61071/2016 - Dated:- 9-8-2016 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) and Mr. B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical) Shri Ashok Dhingra, Advocate for the Appellant Shri Satya Pal, Ld. D. R. for the Respondent ORDER These are three appeals dealing with interconnected matters and hence are taken up together for disposal. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of inorganic chemicals liable to central excise duty. They are also registered with the department fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t credit and imposed penalty under section 78. We have heard both the sides and exarnined appeal records. The first two appeals above deal with the appellants liability on reverse charge basis on services received from foreign entity. The third appeal is dealing with credit taken on the service tax paid on such services by the appellant. Regarding appellant's liability to service tax on reverse charge basis, when the services are provided by a foreign service provider having no office in India, we find the legal position has been settled by the Hon 'ble Bombay High Court in Indian National Shipowners Association 2009 (13) STR 235 which has been affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court. 2010 (17) STR J57. Further, in appellant' .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 5 After considering the submissions, we have to accept the case of the appellants. We have already reproduced the relevant provisions, in this order. Obviously, the invoices issued to the appellants by the input service provider did not attract clause (b) of Sub-Rule (1) of Rule 9. This clause, in fact, did not apply to service tax at all. The Explanation to this clause was also therefore not applicable to the above invoices issued by the input service provider. Documents for availment of credit of service tax paid on input services were those referred to under clauses (e), (f) and (g) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 9. The Explanation ibid was not applicable to any of these provisions. Therefore, the view taken by the commissioner in para 7.03 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates