Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

K. Kachradas Patel Specific Family Trust Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central, Gujarat

2016 (10) TMI 402 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Expenditure on free distribution of exercise note books - whether was in the nature of advertisement, publicity and sales promotion within the meaning of subsection (3A) read with subsection (3B) of section 37? - Held that:- The issue stands concluded against the applicant assessee by the decision of Andhra Pradesh High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ampro Food Products [ 1995 (2) TMI 54 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court ]on identical facts, namely, distribution of note books, the Andhra Prad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

les promotion i.e. gross expenditure less amount recovered by the applicant / assessee from its dealer can be considered for disallowance under Section 37(3A) of the Act. It also observed that where no claim for expenditure under Section 37 of the Act is made then no disallowance under sub-Section (3A) of Section 37 of the Act can be made. The question as posed for our opinion itself records as a fact, that no expenditure was claimed by the applicant assessee in respect of the advertisement expe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) seeks our opinion in respect of Assessment Year 198485, 1985-86 and 198687 on the following substantial questions of law : (i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the expenditure of ₹ 13,97,962/( ₹ 16,25,038 for A.Y. 1985-86) on the free distribution of exercise note books was in the nature of advertisement, publicity and sales promotion wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

advertisement, particularly in view of the fact that the said expenditure was never claimed by way of deduction and the said expenditure incurred by the assessee for and on behalf of the Consignment Agent was subjected to disallowance under the provisions of Sec.37(3A) r.w.s. 37(3B) in the hands of the Consignment Agents? (iii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in disallowing the deduction u/s 80I of the Act on the interest income of ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly, distribution of note books, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the same was in the nature of sales promotion / advertisement. (b) In the above view, he does not dispute the applicability of Ampro Food Products (supra) to the present facts. Consequently, question (i) as raised for our opinion is answered in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the respondent Revenue and against the applicant assessee. 4. Regarding question (ii) : (a) This issue arises for Assessment Years 198485 and 1985-86 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t / sales promotion expenditure which is incurred would be recoverable from the distributors. (c) For the assessment year 198485, the applicant assessee expended a sum of ₹ 22.68 lakhs on advertisement / sales promotion. However, in terms of the agreement with the distributors, the applicant assessee collected an amount of ₹ 27.93 lakhs from its distributors on account of sales promotion / advertisement expenses, leaving a surplus of ₹ 5.34 lakhs. It is the appellant's case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee is that it has not claimed any expenditure, as a deduction for the reason that it was incurred by the Distributors was negatived. (e) Before us, Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the applicant urges that in any case, the amount to be considered as expenditure is only the net amount after excluding the amount recovered from its distributors. This was in the alternative to his submission that as is evident from the question as framed, no expenditure under Section 37 of the Act has been clai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

om its dealer can be considered for disallowance under Section 37(3A) of the Act. It also observed that where no claim for expenditure under Section 37 of the Act is made then no disallowance under subSection (3A) of Section 37 of the Act can be made. (g) The relevant observations of the Gujarat High Court in Vadilal Industries Ltd (supra) are as under : 12. Therefore, the first thing is to determine what is the expenditure claimed by the assessee; is it the gross amount debited to the Advertise .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd when we speak of a joke at another's expense. But the idea of spending in the sense of paying out or away money is the primary meaning and it is with that meaning that we are concerned. Expenditure is thus what is paid out or away and is something which is gone irretrievably. 13. Applying the aforesaid tests to the facts of the case, it is not possible to state that the gross amount debited to the Advertisement and sales promotion account was the amount which was paid out or paid away, no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be no question, whether the amount is allowable or otherwise. In other words, there cannot be any disallowance of an amount which is not claimed as a deduction. The Tribunal has recorded a finding that the assessee has claimed an expenditure of ₹ 46,473 only; that would be the only amount which would come up for consideration as being allowable or otherwise under S.37(1) of the Act. The scheme of the Act itself envisages that only after amount is determined under S.37(1) of the Act as bei .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version