Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Mubarak Trading Company Versus Commissioner of Income Tax

I.T.A. No. 327 of 2002 - Dated:- 29-1-2008 - C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR AND T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. For Petitioner : Sri. T.M. Sreedharan For Respondent : SRI. P.K.R. Menon(SR.), Sr. Counsel for it ORDER C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J. The appellant, a partnership firm, has filed this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal confirming denial of status to them as a "firm" in proceedings completed by the Commissioner of Income .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

already filed as one filed against notice issued under Section 148 of the Act. The assessing officer thereafter completed the assessment under Section 147 read with Section 143(3), but assigned the status of firm to the appellant. The Commissioner of Income tax in suo motu revision proceedings initiated under Section 263 of the Act, declared that appellant is not entitled to be assessed in the status of a "firm" and should be assessed as "Association of persons" on account of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

question redrafted by us is given hereunder: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and particularly in view of admitted failure of the appellant to file return under sub-section (1), or (4) or (5) of Section 139, the appellant is entitled to be assessed in the status of a "firm" or has to be assessed in the status of "association of persons" under Section 184(5) of the Income Tax Act? 3. We have heard counsel appearing for the appellant and senior counse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ision of Section 144 which states that the assessing officer on being satisfied by the failure of any of the three conditions referred to therein shall after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard make an assessment to the best of his judgment. Referring to this provision, counsel contended that in the absence of best judgment assessment under Section 144(1), Section 184(5) of the Act has no application. In this case, since assessment is specifically made under Section 147 read with S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppreciate the rival contentions, we extract hereunder Section 184(5) prior to the amendment by Finance Act, 2003 which is relevant for decision in this case: 184(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, where, in respect of any assessment year, there is on the part of a firm any such failure as is mentioned in Section 144, the firm shall not be assessed as such for the said assessment year and, thereupon the firm shall be assessed in the same manner as a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(1) of section 139 and has not made a return or a revised return under sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) of that section, or (b) fails to comply with all the terms of a notice issued under sub-section (1) of section 142 or fails to comply with a direction issued under sub-section (2A) of that section, or (c) having made a return, fails to comply with all the terms of a notice issued under sub- section (2) of section 143, the Assessing Officer, after taking into account all relevant material whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion 144(1). So much so, there is failure on the part of the appellant as contemplated under Section 144 and therefore Section 184 (5) is attracted. 4. However, the question to be considered is whether in order to deny the status as Firm and to assess the assessee as AOP under Section 184(5) consequent upon the failure under Section 144(1), the assessment has to be best judgment assessment or not. Counsel for the appellant has relied on the Notes on Clauses of Finance Bill 2003 by which Section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

existed prior to the amendment was irrational. The provision existed prior to amendment disentitles a firm from retaining registration, if there was failure in regard to filing of return or complying with the notice issued by the Officer. However, major violation of evasion of tax leading to income escaping assessment still entitles a firm for retaining registration, if there was technical compliance in filing returns or complying with notices. Probably it is to get over this irrational and disc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aka High Court held that failure to file return can arise only when it was possible for the assessee to file return in time. Therefore the case decided by the Karnataka High Court applies to the facts of that case only and has no application here. 5. Another contention raised by the appellant is that unless there is Section 144 assessment, the assessee cannot be said to have committed a failure referred to in clauses (a) to (c) of the said Section. We are unable to accept this position because f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version