Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

State of Rajasthan Versus Union of India And Others

2016 (10) TMI 462 - SUPREME COURT

Levy of service tax - security services - sovereign functions - providing/deploying additional police force at various Banks/Institutions/Organisations or at various events - work of character verification and providing security as per the provisions of Sections 11 and 46 of the Rajasthan Police Act, 2007 for the purpose of maintaining law and order situation - Held that:- Against the order passed by the Assessing Officer, the plaintiff had even preferred an appeal before the Commissioner, Centr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Finance Act. The Doctrine of Election would, therefore, become applicable in a case like this. After choosing one particular remedy the plaintiff cannot avail the other remedy as well, in respect of the same relief founded on same cause of action. - The plaint is, therefore, rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. - Decided against the petitioner. - Original Suit (S). No (S). 1/2016 - Dated:- 4-10-2016 - A. K. Sikri And N. V. Ramana, JJ. For the Petitioner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ovisions of Sections 11 and 46 of the Rajasthan Police Act, 2007 for the purpose of maintaining law and order situation, are in the nature of sovereign functions and are hence exempt from the levy of service tax. (b) Declare that the plaintiff being not a person is outside the scope and ambit of the Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 and therefore the levy of service tax is without authority of law. (c) Declare that the levy of service tax on the plaintiff in relation to the activities of provi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rvice tax from the plaintiff is without jurisdiction. (e) Pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant no. 3 from issuing further show cause notices to the plaintiff for imposing any service tax. (f) Pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interests of justice. In nutshell, the case setup by the plaintiff is that no service tax is payable on the activity of the Rajasthan Police in providing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version