Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Pioneer Profile Industries Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-I

2016 (10) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Manufacture - whether the activity of profiles cutting from M.S. plates is amount to manufacture of excisable goods - appellant submitted that while computing demand, benefit of cum-duty price was also not considered - issues regarding limitation and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ice, on perusal of orders of both the lower authorities, we find that these issues were not raised. Since, the issues on limitation and valuation are mixed question of law and fact, it is a fit case for remand to examine the facts that whether any su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-duty price and to re-quantify the demand accordingly. The penalty also to re-quantified accordingly. - Appeal disposed of by way of remand - E/2608/05-Mum - A/85413/16/EB - Dated:- 19-1-2016 - Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) and Mr. Raju, Member .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ise, Pune-I, wherein upholding the Order-in-Original, the appeal of the appellant was rejected. 2. The issue involved in the present case is whether the activity of profiles cutting from M.S. plates is amount to manufacture of excisable goods. 3. Shr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case is that whether the activity amount to manufacture or otherwise and this matter was under consideration before various forum. Therefore extended period is not applicable. He also submits that while computing demand benefit of cum-duty price was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of law, it can be raised any stage including of this Tribunal. 4. On the other hand, Shri Ashutosh Nath, Ld. Asstt. Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He further submits that this is th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version