Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (10) TMI 487 - ITAT KOLKATA

2016 (10) TMI 487 - ITAT KOLKATA - TM - Undisclosed credit entries reflecting in the bank statements - Held that:- We disagree with the view taken by the lower authorities that the credit entries reflecting in the undisclosed bank statement are representing the income from undisclosed sources. It is because that it is the duty of the lower authorities to establish the exact nature and character of such receipts. The argument placed by Ld AR that these credit entries are reflecting from the discl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee. In view of above, we find no undisclosed income / investment has escaped assessment. Therefore, we reverse the order of Authorities Below. AO is directed accordingly. Hence, inter-connected ground of assessee is allowed. - Addition u/s 40A - Held that:- As decided in CIT vs. Crescent Export Syndicate [2008 (7) TMI 977 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT ] the genuineness of the purchase has been accepted by the ld. CIT (Appeal) which has also not been disputed by the department as it appears for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a Ravi, Judicial Member For The Appellant : Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri Rajat Kr. Kureel, JCIT-SR-DR ORDER PER Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member:- This appeal by the assessee is against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXXII, Kolkata dated 03.12.2012. Assessment was framed by ITO Ward-49(4), Kolkata u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) vide his order dated 30.12.2010 for assessment year 2008-09. In this appeal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r that on the facts of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has failed to consider the Written Submission explaining deposits with AXIS Bank tallied with UBI account and opening balance required consideration ₹ 253,287/- as such the finding in appellate order confirming the addition of ₹ 2,76,150/- is wrong, arbitrary, and illegal. 4. For that on the facts of the 275000/-case, the source of investment in F.D s with AXIS Bank ₹ 27,500/- were deposits out of withdrawal from same bank, as suc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llant claimed immunity under Rule 6DD(k) the I.T Rule, 1962 and all the relevant evidences were produced to justify the claim. 7. For that on the facts of the case, payee is raising Service Tax on bills, therefore, services were rendered services agent M/s Active Advertising & Marketing who in turn, making cash payment exceeding ₹ 20,000/- to Newspapers and supporting evidences were submitted in appeal. 8. For that proviso to sec. 40A(3) although find place in Written Submission but ig .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee is an individual engaged in the business of advertising agency. The return of income was filed declaring income from business and interest for ₹ 1,35,762/-. Thereafter the case was selected for scrutiny assessment through CASS module and assessment was framed u/s 143(1) of the Act at ₹ 27,81,470/-. 3. The issues raised in ground no. 2 to 5 are interconnected so they are being clubbed together and disposed by passing consolidate order. The issues relate to the money deposited in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee in his return of income. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer proposed to add the same to the total income as from the undisclosed source. In rebuttal, the assessee submitted that all the transactions of this bank account are of personal nature and therefore it was not disclosed. However, the AO disregarded the plea of the assessee by treating the same as undisclosed income for ₹ 1,02,699/- and accordingly added to the total income of the assessee. Similarly, the assessee made i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed to add the same to the total income as from the undisclosed source. In rebuttal, assessee submitted that all the transactions of this bank account are of personal nature and therefore it was not disclosed. However the AO disregarded the plea of the assessee by treating the same as undisclosed income for ₹ 2,76,150/- and accordingly added to the total income of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal to ld. CIT(A) who has upheld the order of the AO. Being aggrieved by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ges from 5 to 18 of the paper book. On the other hand, Ld. DR submitted that it is difficult to ascertain whether the credit entries reflecting in the undisclosed bank account are income from undisclosed sources. These undisclosed bank accounts were found by the AO on the basis of Annual Information Report. The assessee has not disclosed the same to escape from the tax liability from the undisclosed sources. Ld. DR vehemently relied on the order of authorities below. 6. We have heard rival conte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

flecting in the bank statements represent the undisclosed income / investment. At the outset, we disagree with the view taken by the lower authorities that the credit entries reflecting in the undisclosed bank statement are representing the income from undisclosed sources. It is because that it is the duty of the lower authorities to establish the exact nature and character of such receipts. The argument placed by Ld AR that these credit entries are reflecting from the disclosed bank account has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

above, we find no undisclosed income / investment has escaped assessment. Therefore, we reverse the order of Authorities Below. AO is directed accordingly. Hence, inter-connected ground of assessee is allowed. 7. Next inter-connected issue raised by the assessee in ground no. 6 to 8 in this appeal is that ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of the AO by sustaining the disallowance of ₹ 19,62,575/- u/s 40A(3) read with rule 6DD(k) of Income tax Rules 1962. 8. The assessee during the ye .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted the transaction as well as the party to whom the payment was made. The payment was made to payee in cash as the party denied to receive the same in cheque. As such, assessee would not have been able to carry on the business without making the cash payment to the party concern. Ld. AR pleaded that expenditure should be allowed on account of business expediency. On the other hand, Ld. DR submitted that payment made by assessee is against the provision of Sec. 40A(3) of the Act. The payment mad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version