Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

A.C.I.T Central Circle 1 Tiruchirapalli Versus Smt. S. Inbajothi W/o Shri V. Subramani

I.T.A. No. 819/Mds/2011 - Dated:- 16-12-2011 - SHRI N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER Appellant by: Shri V. Subbarayan Respondent by: Shri Shaji P. Jacob, Sr. DR. O R D E R PER N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : This is an appeal filed by Revenue for the assessment year 2005-2006 against the order dated 22.02.2011 of Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals] -VI, Tiruchirapalli. 2. The first issue involved is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the entire addition m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e appellant submitted as under:- 'As against admitted income of ₹ 1,12,760/-, the learned A.D. assessed ₹ 4,46,303 as income from contract business. The total amount of contracts received by cheque was ₹ 43,03,336/-. In other words, the learned A.O. assessed 10.37% as income. Your appellant wishes to submit that the profit from contracts as estimated by the learned A. O. is too high and arbitrary as he had not disclosed or discussed for the estimate of income. The learned A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eted and justice rendered". I have duly considered the observations of the Assessing Officer and the submissions of the appellant. From a perusal of para 3.3 of the assessment order, I find that the Assessing Officer had not discussed about the accounts of the appellant, except a passing reference to self - vouchers. In other words, the Assessing Officer had not made out a case for rejecting the accounts and thus resorting to a fair estimate of the profit. Further, as pointed out by the app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sing Officer had neither discussed the reasons for estimation nor the basis for such estimation. In the circumstances, I am unable to sustain addition made by the Assessing Officer. Accordingly, I hereby direct the Assessing Officer to adopt income of ₹ 1,12,760/- as against ₹ 4,46,303/- estimated by him. 4. The ld. D.R. Shri Shaji P. Jacob, vehemently argued and supported the order of the Assessing Officer. He submitted that the assessee has filed Return of Income on the basis of es .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat before estimating the income, the Assessing Officer issued a show cause notice which is reproduced in the assessment order itself. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Assessing Officer has not rejected the books of account before estimating the income of the assessee. 5. On the other hand, the ld. A.R. of the assessee Shri V. Subbarayan supported the order of the Assessing Officer. 6. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material avail .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessing Officer. We find that no specific error in the books of account or supporting vouchers could be brought on record by the Revenue. From the records available before us, it is not clear as to how the books of account of the assessee were incomplete. Further, it is also observed that no specific error in the vouchers produced by the assessee could be pointed out by the Assessing Officer. It is not the case of the Revenue that the self-made vouchers were not verifiable. The assessee explain .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the order of the ld. CIT(A). It is confirmed. Ground of appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. 8. The only other issue in this appeal is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the entire addition made by the Assessing Officer relating to peak credit of ₹ 10.34.382/- without verifying the SB account No. 1190013776. 9. The ld. CIT(A) has observed as under: 7. Addition towards peak credit in bank account &s. 10,34,382:- In para. 3.6 of the assessment order, the A.O. observed as under:- " .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n for ₹ 10,34,382/- is added to the total income of the assessee. " In her Written Submissions dt. 26-10-2009, the appellant submitted as under:- "While making the addition of ₹ 10,34,382/- the Assessing Officer observed thus: I "It has been observed that there has been a plethora . . . . .. i • • • The peak credit appearing on for ₹ 10,3,382/- is added to the total income of the assessee . Your appellant is submitting herewith a photo copy of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the balance Sheet as on 31-3-05 filed along with the original return long before the date of search. Thus the said account is disclosed and the A. O. is in error to treat it as undisclosed (c) Your appellant wishes to submit that the question of assessment of peak credit in a bank account shal1 arise only if it is an undisclosed account. (d) Further, the A. O. has not disclosed the basis on which he arrived at the 'peak credit'. (e) It appears that the learned A.O. had brought to tax the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

all, the A. O. did not observe the basic requirement of putting this point across to the assessee during the course of the assessment proceedings, as is evident Dom the pre-assessment notice and thus violated the principles of natural justice. It is prayed that the unjustified addition made by the A. O. may please be deleted and justice rendered. I have considered the observations of the Assessing Officer. and the arguments of the appellant. The contention of the appellant says it all and I hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Notification: CGST Rate Schedule u/s 9(1) - notifying rates of CGST @ 2.5%, 6%, 9%, 14%, 1.5% and 0.125% on Supply of Goods

Forum: REGISTRETION

Forum: On what Value tax to be deducted at source (TDS)

Highlight: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods. - Notification no. 1/2017 as amended vide notification dated 22-9-2017

Notification: IGST Rate Schedule u/s 5(1) - notifying rates of IGST @ 5%, 12%, 18%, 28%, 3% and 0.25% on supply of goods.

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version