Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income-tax Versus Rampur Engg. Co. Ltd.

IT Appeal Nos. 791, 1015, 1044, 1120, 1138, 1155 & 1159 of 2005 45, 79, 80, 127, 211, 221, 252, 323, 326, 329, 339, 490, 491, 492, 548, 562, 583, 590, 591, 647, 664, 751 & 752 of 2006 - Dated:- 2-6-2006 - T.S. THAKUR AND SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, JJ. R.D. Jolly, JR. Goel, Sanjeev Sabharwal, Mrs. P.L. Bansal, Vishnu Sharma, Ms. Rashmi Chopra and Ms. Sonia Mathur for the Appellants. O.P. Sapra, Sandeep Sapra, Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha, Anil Sharma, Arun Khosla, Manof Arora, V.P. Gupta, Basant Kumar, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d that the authority initiating the penalty had not recorded its satisfaction regarding concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars thereof by the assessee. The revenue has assailed the correctness of the said orders in these appeals. 2. Learned counsel for the revenue advanced a two-fold submission in support of these appeals. Firstly it was contended that the issue of a notice proposing to initiate penalty proceedings against the assessee was in itself indicative of the satis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he words 'I am satisfied that the assessee has concealed his income or furnished inaccurate particulars thereof, would be of no consequence according to the learned counsel. The true test is whether a reading of the order demonstrates application of mind by the authority to the question of concealment and whether satisfaction about such concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars is discernible from the same. 3. We have given our anxious considerations to the submissions made at the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ollowed the decision in Ram Commercial's case-Ed) and CIT v. JK Synthetics Ltd. (1996) 219 ITR 267 (Del). From a conspectus of these decisions, it is evident that the following propositions of law relevant to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act are fairly well settled : (i) That the officer initiating the penalty proceedings must record his satisfaction that the assessee has concealed his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. (ii) Such satisfact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion of penalty proceedings is itself incompetent. 4. The contention urged on behalf of the revenue, that the issue of a notice initiating penalty proceedings should in itself constitute satisfaction of the authority initiating the proceedings, must fail. The decision of this court and those of the apex court in D.M Manasvi v. CIT (1972) 86 ITR 557 (SC) and CIT v. S.V. Angidi Chettiar (1962) 44 ITR 739 (SC) do not support that proposition. As a Bench of co-ordinate jurisdiction, we are bound by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the course of the order made by it recorded findings which would in themselves constitute not only proper application of mind but satisfaction of the authority that the assessee has either concealed his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. Recording of satisfaction before initiating proceedings is in our opinion a requirement that ensures that penalty proceedings are not initiated as a matter of course and in a mechanical fashion. The scheme of the Act and the provisions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d is thus the very essence of the requirement of recording satisfaction. The statute does ,not, however, prescribe any format in which satisfaction may be recorded or application of mind demonstrated. It would, therefore, depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case whether or not the authority has applied its mind to the question of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of any such income. It follows that the question whether the authority was or was not satisfie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Updates     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version