Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2014 (2) TMI 1270 - ITAT MUMBAI

2014 (2) TMI 1270 - ITAT MUMBAI - TMI - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - incorrect claim of depreciation - Held that:- The assessee furnished all the details relating to the assets i.e. the truck and claimed the depreciation. - However, merely on the basis that an incorrect claim of depreciation was made by the assessee, it cannot be said that it was a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income. Thus we are of the view that it is not a fit case for levying the penalty under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). 3. Facts of the case in brief are that the assessee claimed depreciation of ₹ 1,08,276 on the truck purchased on 29.03.2006 for a sum of ₹ 7,21,838 and claimed the aforesaid depreciation on the said truck. The A.O. did not allow the claim of the assessee for depreciation and made addition of ₹ 1,08,276. The A.O. also initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act and levi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT and another [(2012) 348 ITR 306 (SC)] and CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd. [(2012) 322 ITR 158 (SC)]. 5. In his rival submissions, Ld. D.R. strongly supported the orders of the authorities below and further submitted that the assessee by claiming wrong depreciation not only concealed the income, but also furnished inaccurate particulars of income, therefore, penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was rightly levied by the AO and conformed by the Ld. CIT(A). 6. We hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the rate of depreciation were furnished to the AO. 7. On the similar issue, the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has held as under:- Where there is no finding that any details supplied by the assessee in its return are found to be incorrect or erroneous or false there is no question of inviting the penalty under section 271(1)(c). A mere making of a claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate part .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version