Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner of Income tax, Rohtak Versus Shri Virender Natha Kataria

2006 (10) TMI 461 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

ITR No.58 of 1991 - Dated:- 30-10-2006 - ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND RAJESH BINDAL JJ. Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate, for the revenue. JUDGMENT: Following question has been referred for opinion of this Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' B .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unal, was right in holding that the assessee-HUF will be entitled to exemption under section 54 B(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?" Learned counsel for the revenue relies upon judgment of the Madras High Court in CIT v. R. Vijayakumar, (1995) 214 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

91) 191 ITR 211. We find that an identical issue has already been gone into by ITR No.58 of 1991 this Court in Raghunath Dass Sethi v. CIT, (2005) 277 ITR 341, wherein following the judgment of Delhi high Court in CIT v. KC Sahni (HUF), (2000) 246 IT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version