Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (10) TMI 661 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (10) TMI 661 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Imposition of ADD - purified terephthalic acid - import from China PR, EU, Korea RP and Thailand - N/N.23/2015 - CUS (ADD) dated 27/05/2015 - status of MCPI as domestic industry - 66% of shares of this unit is with Mitsubishi Chemical Corp., Japan who also hold 40% of Samnam Petrochemicals who is an exporter of subject goods to India - Held that: - During POI Samnam's export of subject goods to India is an exception and not a regular trading activity. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Held that: - IOCL has neither supported nor opposed the application for anti-dumping investigation. The other 2 producers of subject goods in India account for more than 50% of production. Hence, the DA is correct in analyzing the data furnished to arrive at conclusion. The absence of support by IOCL is not relevant for the investigation. The sale price of IOCL being lesser than the DI has not been substantiated during investigation by the DA. On the impact of inter-se competition among domesti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

after oral hearing have to submit written note of their comments which has to be made available to all the other parties who will insist on further oral hearing and written comments on the issues raised which has to be made known to all interested parties and the cycle will continue indefinitely without any possible conclusion by the DA. The initiation of investigation for AD duty was notified with supporting applications. All interested parties give comments and were personally heard. Thereaft .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vested with the power to analyse and arrive at a clear finding, the DA acted within his mandate. Adverse finding cannot be ipso-facto basis of allegation of discretionary excess. - ADD rightly imposed - appeal rejected - decided against appellant. - Anti Dumping COD Application No. 50484 of 2016, 50485, 5086, 5087, 5088,5089,5090 and 5091 and Appeal No. 50348 of 2016, 50348,50349,50350 and 50351 - Order No. 53518-53521/20162016 - Dated:- 14-9-2016 - Shri Justice Dre Satish Chandra, Presiden .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ti-Dumping and Allied Duties, Ministry of Commerce and Industry and Notification No. 23/2015 - CUS (ADD) dated 27/05/2015 issued by Ministry of Finance. 2. M/s MCC PTA India Corporation Pvt. Ltd. (MCPI) and M/S Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL) (the DI) jointly approached the DA for initiation of anti-dumping investigation on import of purified terephthalic acid (subject goods) from China PR, EU, Korea RP and Thailand. The DA initiated such investigation. After following the procedure in terms of C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

During the pendency of WP, the Government issued Customs notification imposing AD duty. Another W.P. was filed thereafter. The Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 16/2/2016 granted liberty to the appellants to file appeals before the Tribunal under Section 9C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 within two weeks. Accordingly, present appeals were filed. Having considered the above factual position we condone the delay in filing these appeals and take up the appeals for further disposal. 4. The learn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

principles of natural justice as the appellants were not given all relied upon evidences and no post disclosure hearing was granted. (d) the Final Finding has been issued after exercise of discretion in arbitrary and seemingly biased manner. The disclosure statement did not contain details like effect of IOCL prices and injury examination in Plant Il of MCPL due to new technology found faulty. 5. The learned Counsel for DI contested the submissions of appellants. It is submitted that : (a) Price .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ctice of providing another round of hearing post disclosure. All interested parties have been heard during investigation. (e) the technology related problem in MCPI resulting in injury also has been dealt with by the DA. The inter-se competition among domestic units have also been considered. 6. The learned Counsel for the DA supported the Final Findings. He reiterated the DA's Findings, more specifically under paras 67 to 99 on price undercutting due to dumped imports. 7. The learned AR for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. It was argued that 66% of shares of this unit is with Mitsubishi Chemical Corp., Japan who also hold 40% of Samnam Petrochemicals who is an exporter of subject goods to India. We have examined the factual and legal position in this regard, During POI Samnam's export of subject goods to India is an exception and not a regular trading activity. Further, Mitsubishi Chemical Corp., Japan does not have controlling effect on the activities of Samnam Korea. We are in agreement with the DA that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

posed the application for anti-dumping investigation. The other 2 producers of subject goods in India account for more than 50% of production. Hence, the DA is correct in analyzing the data furnished to arrive at conclusion. The absence of support by IOCL is not relevant for the investigation. The sale price of IOCL being lesser than the DI has not been substantiated during investigation by the DA. On the impact of inter-se competition among domestic producers, the DA found that the injury to DI .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ies on 19/11/2014. After analysis of all submissions the DA notified disclosure of such analysis. Post disclosure the interested parties again submitted their comments. The appellant's plea for another hearing again is not tenable. In the name of natural justice a situation cannot be created which will defeat the very process of intended investigation and remedy thereafter. If appellant's plea is accepted, it follows a second hearing is to be considered for all parties, who after oral he .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sis of all facts and comments after due verification the DA discloses the proposals. Again comments are called for. Finally, the DA notifies his Final Findings. This procedure has been followed by the DA. We find no legal infirmity or denial of natural justice by the DA in this case. 12. The Final objection is on injury analysis being arbitrary and on use of excessive discretion by DA. Specific reference was made to MCPI suffering injury in Plant Il operation due to faulty technology not due to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version