Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sree Drg Vinyls Industries Versus The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT) , The Assistant Commissioner (CT)

Maintainability of appeal when AO has rectified or refused to rectify an order - validity of Return memo - return of appeal petitions filed by the petitioner against the rectified assessment orders - appeals presented after a gap of more than ten months from the date of original order of assessment - what would be the effect of a rectified order? - Section 55(4) of the Act - Held that: - similar issue decided in the case of State of Tamil Nadu vs. Sabarigir Industries [2014 (3)193 - MADRAS HIGH .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o the provisions under Section 55(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, inserted by Amendment Act No. 31 of 1972, providing for appeal and revision remedy when an order of rectification is made, and not when the authority concerned refuses to pass an order of rectification - decided against Revenue. - Whether the appeal petition, which was filed after the passing of the revised order of assessment, could be held to be presented within time, in accordance with the provisions of Se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion disposed off - impugned return memos are set aside, leaving it open to the petitioner to raise all the contentions before the Appellate Authority. The petitioner is directed to re-present the appeal along with a copy of this order and the Appellate Authority shall entertain the appeal and deal with the same in accordance with law - decided partly in favor of petitioner. - W.P.Nos.28614 to 28618 of 2016, W.P.No.28614 of 2016 - Dated:- 17-8-2016 - T. S. Sivagnanam, J. For the Petitioner : Mr. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, as being not maintainable. The reason for returning the appeal petition is on the ground that the appeals have been presented after a gap of more than ten months from the date of original order of assessment, i.e. 5.8.2015 and in the rectified order passed by the Assessing Officer dated 1.6.2016, excepting for the tax paid particulars, all other matters are identical to that of the original assessment order. 4. The legal issue to be determined is as to what would be the effect of a rectified o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tax Act, 1959, which is para materia with Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act. While deciding the said question, the Hon'ble Division Bench held as follows :- 6. As far as the first issue on the maintainability of the appeal is concerned, in the decision reported in 39 STC 260, STATE OF TAMIL NADU vs. CROMPTON ENGG. CO., this Court held that there is a clear and a real distinction between an order allowing an application for rectification and thereby rectifying or modifying the original or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

remedy. In so holding, this Court referred to the provisions under Section 55(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, inserted by Amendment Act No. 31 of 1972, providing for appeal and revision remedy when an order of rectification is made, and not when the authority concerned refuses to pass an order of rectification. 7. Similar view was also taken in the decision of this Court reported in 114 STC 359 STATE OF TAMIL NADU v. SPEEDLINE AGENCIES. This Court, in paragraph 5 of the judgme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal or revision against the order declining to rectify. If the authority which made the original order is of the view that there are in fact no errors in the order which need to be rectified, or can be rectified under Section 55 of the Act, no further proceedings can be taken by applicant, against the refusal of the authority to make an order in favour of the person applying for rectification. " 8. In the light of the above stated decisions and in view of Section 55(4) of the Act, the fi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntion of the Assessing officer is with regard to the tax paid by the petitioner. The petitioner has immediately filed petition for rectification, stating that tax paid should be made note of in the assessment order. Though this application was filed by the petitioner in time, the Assessing Officer passed orders only on 1.6.2016. It is only thereafter, the petitioner could prefer appeal before the Appellate Authority and has preferred the same. However, the appeal has been returned by the Appella .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e case of State of Tamil Nadu vs. E.P.Nawab Marakkadai, [1996(100) STC 1]. 8. The question which arose for consideration before the Full Bench was whether the appeal petition, which was filed after the passing of the revised order of assessment, could be held to be presented within time, in accordance with the provisions of Section 31 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act and whether remittance made by the petitioner recording the pre-depsoit was valid. The Hon'ble Full Bench has held as follows:- The a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version