Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (11) TMI 54 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (11) TMI 54 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Reversal of CENVAT credit - whether interest is liable on the cenvat credit which was reversed and whether the appellant is liable to penalty under Rule 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit rules, 2004? - Held that: - the unit had not commenced production when the investigation started and hence there was no clearance from the factory. As there was no clearance from the factory, there was no question of utilization of the cenvat credit availed by the party - relian .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as held that mere taken of CENVAT credit facilities is not at all sufficient for claiming of interest as well as penalty - the appellants are not liable to penalty. - Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - Appeal No. E/297/12-Mum - Order No.A/93027/16/SMB - Dated:- 30-9-2016 - Mr. Devender Singh, Member (Technical) Shri J.N. Somaiya, Advocate for the Appellant Shri S.V. Nair, Superintendent (A.R.) for the Respondent ORDER Per Devender Singh This appeal is directed against order-in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eir factory and on scrutiny of the documents, it was revealed that cenvat credit on these items was not admissible to them. Statement of General Manager (Tech.) of the appellant was recorded and the appellants during the course of investigation, realized their mistake and reversed the inadmissible cenvat credit availed on the basic customs duty and cess and also reversed the credit availed on the structural items. The dispute is whether interest is liable on the cenvat credit which was reversed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ny time before its reversal. For this, he relied on the statement of Shri J. Venkatrao, General Manger of the appellant (Questions 3 and 4), to substantiate that production was not started. He further submits that since there was no production and no clearance prior to the reversal of the cenvat credit, there is no loss to the Revenue as the cenvat credit had not been utilized at any stage. He has tried to distinguish the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Indo-Swift laboratori .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

66-HC-MAD-CX. He further submits that since there is no loss to the Revenue and as per the case laws relied by him, interest and penalty be set aside. 4. The Ld. AR appearing for the Revenue, on the other hand, submits that the onus and responsibility to take admissible credit was on the party as per Rule 9(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Relying heavily on the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Indo-Swift Laboratories as reported in 2011 (2) TMI 6- SC, he argued that the law do .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, it is clear from the statement of Shri J. Venkatrao, General Manager, that the unit had not commenced production when the investigation started and hence there was no clearance from the factory. This fact has not been contested ted by the Ld. AR. As there was no clearance from the factory, there was no question of utilization of the cenvat credit availed by the party. On these facts, the case of GTL Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. CCE (supra) cited by the Ld. Advocate, is directly applicable. In the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t it was recovered by way of demanding duty. Therefore, the said facts are not applicable to the facts in hand. In these terms, we hold that the appellants are not liable to pay interest for wrongful availment of Cenvat Credit which has been reversed before utilization by the appellant in light of the decision of the Hon ble High Court in the case of Bill Forge P. Ltd. (supra) which has been followed by coordinate bench in CCE, Raipur Vs. M/s. Sharda Energy and Minerals Ltd. -2013 (291) E.L.T. 4 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version