Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (11) TMI 122 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2016 (11) TMI 122 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT - TMI - Allowance of issue raised before the Appellate Authority for the first time - Held that:- Apex Court in the case of National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1996 (12) TMI 7 - SUPREME Court] clarified that the Appellate Authority is entitled to entertain a claim for the first time on a point of law provided the facts, on the basis of which the claim is made are available on record. This was in the context of dealing with the powers of the Appellate aut .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ity, are already available on record. See Commissioner of Income Tax. Central-I Versus M/s. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders Pvt. Ltd. [2012 (7) TMI 158 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT ] - Income Tax Appeal No. 734 of 2014 - Dated:- 24-10-2016 - M. S. Sanklecha And S. C. Gupte, JJ. Mr. Suresh Kumar, a/w. Ms. Samiksha Kanani, for the Appellant Mr. Ashok Patil, for the Respondent ORDER P. C. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( the Act ) challenges the order dated 4 September 2013 passed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of income filed for the subject Assessment Year, omitted to claim long term capital gains (loss) suffered due to extinguishment of rights in respect of 24767 shares in the defunct company. Similarly, the Respondent Assessee had in its computation of capital gains by mistake omitted to claim exemption to the extent it was entitled to under Section 54F of the Act. The Assessing Officer did not allow the Respondent Assessee to raise those issues during the Assessment proceeding as the same was not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

laim even if not made in the return of income, could be made before the Appellate Authorities. Nevertheless, the impugned order set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer to consider/verify both the claims, which were made by the Respondent Assessee before the Appellate Authority for admissibility on merits. 6. The grievance of the Revenue before us is that any issue, which requires verification/examination of the facts, cannot be raised before the Appella .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version