Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (11) TMI 219 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (11) TMI 219 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2017 (345) E.L.T. 556 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Eligibilty of exemption - N/N. 16/2000 dt. 01.03.2000 - import of Pulse Sprint Flat Bed Treadmill, Pulse Ascent Elevated Treadmill, Pursuit Cycle and Pace Stepper - classification in dispute - whether the items fall under exemption exemption Entry No. 331 or these items are General Physical Exercise equipments used in gymnasium falling under CTH 95069.90? - duty paid under protest - whether refund claim justified? - Held .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ified the specific imported goods that the said equipments are used for national or international tournaments. In our view, the department has no jurisdiction to question the certificate issued by Sports Authority of India. As per the Condition 76 only certification from the apex body is required, so long that condition is complied with exemption is available to the imported goods. Moreover for the purpose of national or international tournaments, the fitness of the player is the primary criteri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ellant - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - Appeal No. C/1402/05 - Order No.A/89383/16/CB - Dated:- 24-8-2016 - Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) and Shri Raju, Member (Technical) None for Appellant Shri V.R. Reddy, Assistant Commissioner (A.R) for respondent Per : Ramesh Nair The issue involved in this case is that All India Tennis Association, New Delhi imported a consignment of Pulse Sprint Flat Bed Treadmill, Pulse Ascent Elevated Treadmill, Pursuit Cycle and Pace Stepper. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uty of ₹ 3,53,419/- under protest thereafter claim the refund of the same. The adjudicating authority rejected the refund claim on the ground that these imported equipments being a general physical exercise equipments are not used in a National or International Championship or Competition to be held in India or abroad. As such, the exemption notification No. 16/2000-Cus dt. 1.3.2000 is not available to the impugned goods. Aggrieved by the adjudication order, the appellant filed appeal befo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ship competition to be held in India or abroad whereas the goods are imported by the appellant are general physical exercise equipments which are used in the gymnasium and not used for games and sports in a national or international championship competition to be held in India or abroad. Therefore the notification is not admissible to the goods of the appellant. 4. We have carefully considered the submissions made by the Ld. A.R. and perused the records. We find that exemption Notification No. 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version