TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 239X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1994. The said section provides for non-issuance of show-cause notice in the case the assessee discharged the service tax liability and the interest thereof on his own ascertainment on being pointed out by the officers. In the case in hand, appellant being a public sector undertaking may have overlooked the provisions of Business Auxiliary Service and on being pointed out discharged the entire ta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Shri Raju, Member (Technical) Shri M.H. Patil, Advocate for the appellant Shri M.P. Damle, AC (AR) for the respondent Per: M.V. Ravindran This appeal is directed against Order-in-Original No. 267/17/2011/ COMMR/KS/ST dated 26.09.2011. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, we fin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as discharged the service tax liability with interest in the month of March and April 2007 and the show-cause notice is issued on 22.02.2008 and there is no additional confirmation of the demand and the amount which were paid by the appellant were only appropriated based on the calculation given by the appellant. It is the submission that the penalty imposed by adjudicating authority under Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ness Auxiliary Service and on being pointed out discharged the entire tax amount with interest. In our view, this is a fit case wherein the revenue authorities should not have issued any show-cause notice as per the provisions of 73(3) of Finance Act, 1994. 7. In our considered view, appellant has made out a case for setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 78, as provisions of Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
