Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Hyva India (Pvt) Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Belapur

Charge differential Central Excise duty - amount received from vehicle manufacturers for undertaking rectification/upgradation / replacing of leaf springs in chassis, which were sent to them for body building - Held that:- The chassis is manufactured by the motor-vehicle manufacturer along with the leaf springs for fabrication of body. The leaf springs cannot be identified as independent of chassis on which duty is paid as manufactured item, by the manufacturer. Secondly, we find that Notificati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

there cannot be any demand on the said value/amount received by the appellant for modification / replacement of the leaf springs before fabricating the body on the said chassis. See Mukul Engineering Works v. Commissioner of Central Excise (2010 (3)605 - CESTAT, MUMBAI) wherein held that the chassis includes running gear, is already included in the value of the chassis when it was cleared for body building on payment of duty. In view of the foregoing, we hold that the impugned order is unsustai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es and perused the records. 3. The issue that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the appellant is required to discharge differential Central Excise duty on the amount received by them from vehicle manufacturers for undertaking rectification/upgradation / replacing of leaf springs in chassis, vÅ1ich were sent to them for body building. Undisputedly, appellant is engaged in the activity of body building on the chassis sent to them, discharges the duty liability on the body wh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nue wants to tax this amount as an amount received for manufacture of chassis. 4. The first appellate authority has come to the conclusion that replacement "modification of the spring leaf is done to make chassis suitable for fitment of the tipper-body and without this modification/ replacement it could not be fitted with the tipper body, hence, this has to be treated as a part of the manufacture of body of motor vehicles and dumpers. We do not find this reasoning recorded by the firs appel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version