Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

SAF Yeast Company Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Lucknow

2016 (11) TMI 411 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

Refund - unjust enrichment - Held that: - if the credit notes are issued after the assessment of the goods then at the time of assessment of the goods duty is already passed on to the purchaser and therefore the duty involved in such value which is reduced by way of issue of credit notes is hit by provisions of unjust enrichment - Appeal is rejected. - Appeal No. E/2656/2007- EX [DB] - ORDER NO. 70680/2016 - Dated:- 8-8-2016 - MR. ANIL CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) and MR. ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR, MEM .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xcess Excise duty. During the relevant period they claimed to have paid Excise duty as per assessable value on the basis of invoices issued and subsequently they have extended discounts to their wholesale dealers by way of issue of credit notes . The refund application was filed through letter dated 07-03-2005. The Original Authority has decided the said refund application through Order-in-Original No. 13-AC/STP/REFUND/2006 dated 17-10-2006. The Original Authority has held that the party has not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the Hon ble Larger Bench in the case of M/s. Grasim Industries(Chemical Division) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhopal reported at 2003 (153) E.L.T. 694 (Tri. - LB) & followed by the case of Dutron Plastics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara- I-II reported at 2006 (199) E.L.T. 289 (Tri.- Mumbai), wherein it was held that after clearance of goods the refund is hit by principles of unjust enrichment. The ld. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Original Order and dismiss the ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sis of a Chartered Accountant Certificate they should have been allowed refund. 4. The ld. Representative Shri Pramod Kumar Shukla employee of the appellant has presented their case. He has submitted that Chartered Accountant Certificate was produced before the Original Authority. However, the Adjudicating Authority has held that the appellant did not produce any evidence on record. He therefore, contended that the appeal may be allowed and refund be granted. 5. The ld. Departmental Representati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version