Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Kirloskar Batteries Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise

CENVAT credit - capital goods cleared after use - Held that: - the appellant was not required to pay excise duty that is in another words debit of Cenvat credit taken at the time of receipt of said capital goods under Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 while removing the said capital goods after use. Therefore, I set aside the Order-in-Appeal and allow the appeal. The appellant shall be entitled for consequential relief, in accordance with law. - Appeal No. E/432/2010-EX[SM] - Final Order No .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sued with a Show Cause Notice dated 28/05/2008 wherein it was proposed to recover an amount of ₹ 11,17,731/- which was equal to the amount of Cenvat credit availed in respect of capital goods cleared after use under invoice No. 01 dated 22/05/2007 to their another Unit at Banglore. The said Cenvat credit was availed during the period from 1997-98 and the capital goods were cleared in 2007 and the said Show Cause Notice invoked provisions Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and proposal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

various case laws to support their claim including in the case of Cummins India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III reported at 2007 (219) E.L.T. 911 (Tri. - Mumbai). The Original Authority did not appreciated the arguments and confirmed the demand of ₹ 11,17,731/- and imposed equal penalty. Aggrieved by the said Order-in-Original No. 27/Additional Commissioner/Noida/2009 dated 16/04/2009, appellant preferred appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). The said appeal was decide .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nglore under invoice No. 1, dated 22/05/2007. It is very clearly stated in the invoice that the removal was stock transfer. He has further relied on ruling by Hon ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Harsh International (Khaini) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise reported at 2012 (281) E.L.T. 714 (Delhi). Referring to the ruling in Para 13, 14 & 15 of the said ruling of Hon ble High Court of Delhi, he has argued that the case is squarely covered by the case law and that the cl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as follows:- 13. M/s Harsh International Pvt. Ltd. admittedly sold the capital goods in June and July, 2007 to M/s Harsh International (Khaini) Pvt. Ltd. The dates of sale thus fall prior to the amendment made with effect from 13/11/2007. The Tribunal has rightly pointed out that the case of Harsh International Pvt. Ltd., fall under Rule 3(5) as it stood amended from 06/05/2005 but before being amended on 13/11/2007. However, we note that the view taken by the Tribunal in the impugned order is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gh Court in Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh Versus Raghav Alloys Ltd., 2011 (268) E.L.T. 161 (P & H) = 2012 (26) S.T.R. 87 (P & H) to refer to unused capital goods and do not take in the used capital goods. It has been observed as under:- 8. We have heard arguments of both the ld. Counsel. The Tribunal has rightly noted that unlike inputs, which get consumed 100% with the same are taken up for use in relation to manufacture of finished goods, capital goods are used over a peri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

such the Assessee shall be liable to pay duty equal to amount of Cenvat Credit availed. The machines which are cleared after utilization cannot be treated as machines cleared as such. With effect from 13/11/2007, a proviso has been added to Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules providing that if the capital goods on which Cenvat Credit has been taken are removed after being used, the manufacturer shall pay the amount equal to Cenvat Credit taken on the said capital goods reduced by 2.5% for each .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Cleared as such . Insertion of proviso w.e.f. 13/11/2007 makes it clear that there is difference between machines cleared without putting into use and cleared after use. The Bombay High Court has upheld the view of the Tribunal in the case of Cummins India Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III, 2007 (219) E.L.T. 911 (Tri. Mumbai). The Tribunal in the case of Nahar Fibres has also dismissed Appeal of the Revenue and there is nothing to show that the said decision of the Tribuna .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version