Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (11) TMI 534

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the assessee. We also find that various Tribunals have held that there should not be any disallowance u/s. 14A of the Act in relation to investment held by assessee as strategic investment. Therefore, we are inclined to reverse the order of Authorities Below in relation to investment in equity share which is strategic investment made by assessee. with regard to investment made in the interest free bonds of HUDCO assessee has not brought anything on record to justify that such investment was made out of its own fund. At the time of hearing, Ld. AR requested the Bench to restore the matter back to the file of AO to check whether the investment was made out of the borrowed fund or own fund of assessee. To this point, Ld. DR raised no ob .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cumstances of the case and in law, the C.I.T.(A) has erred in confirming the addition of ₹ 9,27,329/- as made by A.O under section 14A of the IT Act, 1961 read with Rule-8D of the IT Rules 1962. (2) That the CIT(A) has likewise, erred in confirming the addition of ₹ 1,02,130/- as made by AO under section 40(a)(ia) of the T Act, 1961. Shri V.N. Purohit, Ld. Authorized Representative appeared on behalf of assessee and Shri Anand Kumar Singh, Ld. Departmental Representative appeared on behalf of Revenue. 2. First issue raised by assessee in its appeal is that Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the order of Assessing Officer by sustaining the disallowance of ₹ 8,80,905/- u/s 14A r.w.s Rule 8D of the IT Rules, 1962. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on of the facts, I am not inclined to agree with the submission of appellant. It is observed that the tax auditor has computed the disallowance u/s. 14A by applying the provisions of Rule 8D at ₹ 7,82,695/- having regard to books of account of the appellant company as the tax audit was completed by him. Therefore, it is not correct to say that the auditor has committed a mistake by computing the disallowance under Rule 8D (2)(ii) and 8D(2)(iii). Further, the disallowance u/s 14A computed by the Tax Auditor, having regard to books of account, of appellant company was also accepted by it and therefore same was added to the income as per the computation of income filed along with return of income. I am also not inclined to agree with the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e expenses were disallowed by mistake as all the investments in equity shares are strategic investment. In rejoinder, Ld DR has not brought anything contrary to the advanced argument made by Ld. AR with regard to strategic investment made by the assessee. We also find that various Tribunals have held that there should not be any disallowance u/s. 14A of the Act in relation to investment held by assessee as strategic investment. Therefore, we are inclined to reverse the order of Authorities Below in relation to investment in equity share which is strategic investment made by assessee. In this connection, we rely in the order of Hon ble Lucknow Tribunal in the case of U.P. Electronics Corporation Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2015) 43 CCH 0068. The relevant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t to be considered while applying the provision of Sec. 14A of the Act. However, with regard to investment made in the interest free bonds of HUDCO. In this regard, Ld. AR for the assessee has not brought anything on record to justify that such investment was made out of its own fund. At the time of hearing, Ld. AR requested the Bench to restore the matter back to the file of AO to check whether the investment was made out of the borrowed fund or own fund of assessee. To this point, Ld. DR raised no objection if the matter is restored back to the file of AO for fresh adjudication. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and fair play we are inclined to restore the matter back to the file of AO to a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates