Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Entry tax levy upheld by the Supreme Court

Value Added Tax - VAT and CST - By: - Bimal jain - Dated:- 16-11-2016 Last Replied Date:- 17-11-2016 - Dear Professional Colleague, May the name of Waheguru Ji, be enshrined in your heart.. May Guru Ji s divine love and blessings be with you always… Heartiest wishes on this auspicious occasion….Happy Gurpurab!! The Hon ble Supreme Court on November 11, 2016, has upheld the constitutional validity of Entry tax imposed by States. A nine-judge Constitution Bench, overruling 'compe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Issues: Can the levy of a non-discriminatory tax per se constitute infraction of Article 301 of the Constitution of India? If answer to question above is in the affirmative, can a tax which is compensatory in nature also fall foul of Article 301 of the Constitution of India? What are the tests for determining whether the tax or levy is compensatory in nature? Is the Entry tax levied by the States is violative of Article 301 of the Constitution and in particular have the impugned State enactment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e powers under Entry 52 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, several States in the country, at least 14 of whom are parties to these proceedings, have enacted laws that provide for levy of a tax on the entry of goods into local areas comprising the States . The constitutional validity of these levies was questioned in the different High Courts by assesses/dealers aggrieved of the same, inter alia, on the ground that the same were violative of the constitutionally recognised ri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itution of India. Absence of Presidential sanction in terms of Article 304(b) of the Constitution of India was also set-up as a ground of challenge to the levies imposed by the respective State legislatures. Article 304 of the Constitution of India is reproduced hereunder for ease of reference: 304. Restrictions on trade, commerce and intercourse among States: Notwithstanding anything in article 301 or article 303, the Legislature of a State may by law- (a) impose on goods imported from other St .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e without the previous sanction of the President. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 8700 of 2000 filed before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana was one such petition that assailed the constitutional validity of the Haryana Local Development Act, 2000. Relying upon the decisions of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam & Ors. [ 1960 (9) TMI 94 - SUPREME COURT]( Atiabari case ), Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpensatory in character hence outside the purview of Article 301 of the Constitution. The correctness of the said order was assailed before the Court in Jindal Stripe Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. [ 2003 (9) TMI 345 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ] ( Jindal Stripe case ). A two-Judge Bench of the Court, however, referred the matter to a larger Bench as it noticed an apparent conflict between the pronouncements of the Court in Atiabari and Automobile Transport cases on the one hand and Bh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ge Bench in Bhagatram case. The Court held that the test of some connection as propounded in Bhagatram case had no application to the concept of compensatory tax. The Court, accordingly, overruled the decisions rendered in Bhagatram and Bihar Chamber cases and held that the doctrine of direct and immediate effect of the impugned law on trade and commerce under Article 301 as propounded in Atiabari case and the working test enunciated in Automobile Transport case for deciding whether a tax is com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rther found that in the absence of relevant data before the High Courts, the issue whether the levies were compensatory could not have been considered and accordingly referred the matter back to the High Courts to decide the said aspect. The appeals were, in the meantime, adjourned to await the finding from the High Courts on the question whether the levies were indeed compensatory in nature having regard to the decisions of this Court in Atiabari and Automobile Transport cases. The matters were .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ies imposed by their respective States also on the ground that they were discriminatory in nature hence violative of Article 304(a) of the Constitution. All these judgments and orders of the High Courts, passed after the remand, then, challenged by the States concerned in the appeals filed against the same. These appeals initially came-up before a two-Judge Bench of the Court comprising Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice S.H. Kapadia. Their Lordships referred the same to a Constitution Bench for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

text of tax on vehicles in contradiction to taxes on entry of goods. The Court was of the view that while the Constitution Bench in Jindal Stainless case had dealt with some aspects of the matter, certain other important constitutional issues remained to be examined especially because a conceptually and contextually different approach may be required vis-à-vis transport cases on the one hand and cases of entry tax on goods on the other. The matter was accordingly placed before a five-Judg .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ken in the said two cases had been doubted as early as in the year 1975 in G.K. Krishnan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu [ 1974 (11) TMI 96 - SUPREME COURT ]. The reference order briefly set out some of the questions that required consideration by a larger Bench. Held: By 7:2 majority, the Hon ble Supreme Court answered the reference in the following terms: Taxes simpliciter are not within the contemplation of Part XIII of the Constitution of India. The word Free used in Article 301 does not mean free f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

omobile Transport case and subsequently modified in Jindal Stainless case has no juristic basis and is therefore rejected. Decisions of this Court in Atiabari, Automobile Transport and Jindal Stainless cases and all other judgments that follow these pronouncements are to the extent of such reliance over ruled. A tax on entry of goods into a local area for use, sale or consumption therein is permissible although similar goods are not produced within the taxing State. Article 304(a) of the Constit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version