Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (11) TMI 592

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng the case, there would be no question of inviting the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Even if a wrong claim is made by the assessee that itself does not tantamount to concealment of income. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No.428/Mum/2015 - - - Dated:- 8-9-2016 - Shri Joginder Singh, Judicial Member For The Assessee : None For The Revenue : Shri Sumit Kumar-DR ORDER The assessee is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 25/09/2014 of the Ld. First Appellate Authority, Mumbai. The only ground raised by the assessee pertains to confirming levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act), amounting to ₹ 12,03,030/- as the claimed disallowance u/s 80IB of the Act was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ome from other sources and not from business activities referred u/s 80IB(11a) of the Act, therefore, the penalty was imposed for wrong claim made by the assessee. This proposition is sheltered by the decision from Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. 322 ITR 158 (SC) and CIT vs Ajaib Singh Company 253 ITR 630( P H). While coming to this conclusion, the Hon'ble Apex Court in Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. (supra) observed as under:- A mere making of the claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars regarding the income of the assessee. Such claim made in the Return cannot amount to the inaccurate particulars. 2.4. In the light o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y covered by the provision, the penalty provision cannot be invoked. By any stretch of imagination, making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. In Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Atul Mohan Bindal [2009(9) SCC 589], where Hon'ble Apex Court was considering the same provision, the Court observed that the Assessing Officer has to be satisfied that a person has concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. Hon'ble Court referred to another decision of this Court in Union of India Vs. Dharamendra Textile Processors [2008(13) SCC 369], as also, the decision in Union of India Vs.Rajasthan Spg. Wvg. Mills [2009(13) SCC 448] and reiterated in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ulars. It was further held that the assessee must be found to have failed to prove that his explanation is not only not bona fide but all the facts relating to the same and material to the computation of his income were not disclosed by him. It was then held that the explanation must be preceded by a finding as to how and in what manner, the assessee had furnished the particulars of his income. The Court ultimately went on to hold that the element of mens rea was essential. It was only on the point of mens rea that the judgment in Dilip N. Shroff Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai Anr. was upset. In Union of India Vs. Dharamendra Textile Processors (cited supra), after quoting from Section 271 extensively and also considering Se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Income Tax, Mumbai Anr. (cited supra) to the effect that mens rea was an essential ingredient for the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) that the decision in Dilip N. Shroff Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai Anr. (cited supra) was overruled. I am not concerned in the present case with the mens rea. However, I have to only see as to whether in this case, as a matter of fact, the assessee has given inaccurate particulars. In Webster's Dictionary, the word inaccurate has been defined as:- not accurate, not exact or correct; not according to truth; erroneous; as an inaccurate statement, copy or transcript . I have already discussed the meaning of the word particulars in the earlier part of this order. Reading the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates