Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (11) TMI 694 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2016 (11) TMI 694 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Refund claim - benefit of exemption Notification No.64/1995-CE, dt.16.03.1995 - the Appellants had availed CENVAT Credit of inputs which were used in or in relation to manufacture of dutiable as well as exempted goods; during the course of audit, it was alleged that since separate records were not maintained, they were required to pay 10% of the price of the exempted goods - the Appellants had availed CENVAT Credit of inputs which were used in or in r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

red by the authorities below. Also, in view of the retrospective amendment to the Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules,2004 by virtue of Finance Act,2010 the Appellants are eligible to reverse proportionate CENVAT Credit on inputs attributable to exempted products. However, it is prudent to remand the matter to the Adjudicating authority to ascertain the proportionate credit attributable to exempted products and consider the refund application afresh in the light of above findings. Needless to mention .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ief facts of the case are that the Appellants are engaged in the manufacture of compressor and spares thereof, falling under Chapter 84 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. During the relevant period, the Appellants manufactured and cleared finished goods availing the benefit of exemption Notification No.64/1995-CE, dt.16.03.1995. Since the Appellants had availed CENVAT Credit of inputs which were used in or in relation to manufacture of dutiable as well as exempted goods; during the course of au .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ount of ₹ 4,31,400/- on 14.05.2008. A show cause demand notice was issued to them on 24.07.2008, proposing rejection of the said refund claim. On adjudication, the refund claim was rejected and aggrieved by the said order, they filed appeal before the learned Commissioner (Appeals), who in turn, upheld the order of the Adjudicating Authority and rejected their appeal. Hence the present appeal. 4. The learned Advocate Shri P.G. Mehta for the Appellants submits that during the relevant perio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version