Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Jamshedpur Versus M/s. Engineers Enterprises

2016 (11) TMI 787 - CESTAT KOLKATA

Mis-declaration of value of service - the Adjudicating Authority confirmed and appropriated ₹ 23,07,385/- alongwith interest of ₹ 8,68,576/- and imposed penalty of ₹ 9,67,373/- under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and gave option to the appellant to pay 25% within 30 days of the receipt of the Order-in-Original - Held that: - there was no intention of misdeclaring the value of taxable services in the return. That it being a proprietary concern and due to lack of profession .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

% of the penalty amount of ₹ 9,67,373/- imposed under Section 78 was also paid to put the entire dispute at rest and to purchase peace of mind. - In this appeal, there is no material shown by the department as to how the option given to the respondent is erroneous. In my considered view, the Commissioner (Appeal) is correct in rejecting the appeal filed by the department and there is no reason to deviate from the said order - appeal rejected - decided in favor of Department. - ST/70998 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

able service rendered in their ST-3 returns. After due process of law, the Adjudicating Authority confirmed and appropriated ₹ 23,07,385/- alongwith interest of ₹ 8,68,576/- and imposed penalty of ₹ 9,67,373/- under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and gave option to the appellant to pay 25% within 30 days of the receipt of the Order-in-Original. The revenue being aggrieved, preferred an appeal before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) who rejected the department's appeal an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Order-in-Original). ii) The Commissioner (Appeals) has failed to appreciate that the Department had appealed on the ground that while the Order-in-Original had found that Service Tax to the tune of ₹ 23,07,385/- (including Cess) was not paid by way of willful mis-statement/suppression with an intent to evade; it had imposed a penalty amounting to ₹ 9,67,373/- only under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and that the penalty lower than the Service Tax amount confirmed as having .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etc. and the conditions for imposition of penalty under Section 78 were held to have been fulfilled, penalty at least equal to the Service Tax so held to have been evaded was to be imposed regardless of whether a part of the tax liability was discharged before the issuance of the SCN. iii) The Commissioner (Appeals) has failed to take note of the fact that this was the purport of Para (iii) of the Department's appeal which read as & to quote; That the adjudicating authority had erred in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ough duty has been paid before the issuance of SCN. The said circular is also applicable to Sec.78 of the Finance Act. The adjudicating authority has erred in passing the impugned Order-in-Original in contradiction to the above Board's Circular. 3. Shri A.Srivastava, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that the order of the Adjudicating Authority has dealt the entire issue in details. Further, the assesee's major clients are Tata steel, Jamshedpur. He also submits th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version