Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Jaipur Thar Gramin Bank

2016 (11) TMI 794 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Allowance of deduction u/s 36(1)(v) - allowance of Gratuity Scheme - Held that:- Assessee is sponsored by UCO Bank, a Government of India Undertaking and duly complied with the conditions laid down for approval under section 36(1)(v). At least the Assessing Officer when this factum was brought to his notice that the assessee has filed copy of the trust-deed, application to the competent authority on September 4, 2000 then even the said letter could have been forwarded to the concerned Commission .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Revenue that the assessee has not deposited money in terms of creation of the trust, therefore, in our view the Tribunal on such facts is well justified in holding that the claim is just, proper and allowable. A just and reasonable claim deserves to be allowed. We find that both the appellate authorities have found it allowable on the facts found and is essentially a finding of fact based on material and evidence on record. - D. B. Income Tax Appeal Nos. 131 of 2012, 36 and 69 of 2015 - Dated:- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ut the claim allowed of the Gratuity Scheme created by the assessee and allowed under section 36(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 3. Brief facts noticed are that the respondent-assessee bank is a co-operative society doing banking business and prior to that was assessed as Jaipur Nagaur Anchalik Gramin Bank (sponsored by UCO Bank - a Government of India Undertaking). 4. The Assessing Officer, while examining the books of account and material on record, found that the assessee has claimed a ded .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tax Act. The forwarding letter also contained creation of trust- deed and rules under the gratuity scheme passed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, though it was claimed that it was submitted before the Commissioner who is the competent authority, however, since no formal order was passed by the competent authority, the Assessing Officer rejected the claim of the assessee. 5. The matter was assailed before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the assessee raised claim that the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

venue also resulted into dismissal of the appeal, however, the Tribunal having gone into the merits found that the claim of the assessee is also allowable under section 36(1)(v) read with section 40A(9) of the Act. 7. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that it was mandatory on the part of the assessee to have an approval of the gratuity fund created under section 36(1)(v) and the Act envisages that any contribution made in an approved gratuity fund by the Commissioner enures for deducti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which is claimed by the assessee to have been moved on September 4, 2000, was not found on the records and thus contended that substantial question of law arise out of the order of the Tribunal. 8. We have heard learned counsel for the Revenue and perused the order impugned. At the outset we may mention that time was granted to the learned counsel for the Revenue to come out with the fact that no application was filed by the assessee on September 4, 2000 as there was a specific claim before lea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Janpath, Lal Kothi Scheme, Jaipur. Dear Sir, Re : Gratuity scheme to be approved under Part-C of the Fourth Schedule of the Income-tax Act. We request a reference to your letter on the subject cited above. In compliance to the telephonic conversation on the subject we deputed Mr. K. C. Gupta and Mrs. Ruchi Bhargava Officers to discuss on the subject. As desired we are appending below the necessary information for perusal and records : 1. No. of employees being benefitted under the scheme 662 2. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee company namely K. C. Gupta and Mrs. Ruchi Bhargava were deputed to discuss on the subject and this letter also contained some information sought by the competent authority. The claim of the learned counsel for the Revenue that the said letter was not received on September 4, 2000 but then admittedly we notice that there is a seal of the Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Special Range-1st, Jaipur, with date of receipt being September 4, 2000, but learned counsel contends that this lette .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version