Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Income Tax Officer Ward-5 (3) Surat Versus Shri Pramod T Jariwala

ITA No.2425/Ahd/2009 - Dated:- 29-4-2011 - Shri G.D. Agarwal, Hon ble Vice-President (AZ) And Shri T.K. Sharma, Hon ble Judicial Member. Appellant by : - Shri K Madhusudan SR-DR ORDER PER T.K. Sharma, Judicial Member:- This appeal by the Revenue is against the order dated21-05-2009 of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-III, Surat directing the Assessing Officer to treat the peak balance of the bank account as the assessee s income, instead of the addition of ₹ 32,83,310/- for the assessm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ank statement. Therefore a copy of bank statement was directly obtained from the bank. On perusal of bank statement the AO noticed that assessee has made deposit of ₹ 32,83,310/- out of which ₹ 29,67,725/- were made in cash and remaining amount was through cheques. AO treated the whole credit as appearing in the bank statement as unexplained deposit since the assessee failed to produce an iota of information about the said bank account. On appeal, in the impugned order Ld. CIT(Appeal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion of Ld. CIT(A) directing the Assessing Officer to treat peak balance of the assessee s bank account as assessee s income is not acceptable because the order of AO was based on right footing placing reliance of enormous case laws. He also pointed out that during the course of assessment proceedings, AO has granted many opportunities to explain the deposits as appearing in the bank statement. The said bank consist cheque entered also which were not explained at the time of assessment proceeding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee. Finally, the Ld. DR pointed out that profit of such unaccounted business was also not taxed. Since the assessee was not co-operating during the course of assessment proceedings, the entire deposits appearing in the bank account are to be considered as unexplained cash credit in the hands of the assessee. To sum up, Ld. DR contended that addition of ₹ 32,83,310/- made by Assessing Officer be restored. 5. After hearing the Ld. SR-DR we have carefully going through the order of authorit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

shows several deposits yet, the same money had been repeatedly deposited and withdrawn by the assessee in order to display and increase his creditworthiness in front of those who were dealing with him. It was therefore only a means of enhancing his image as being financially strong and healthy. Therefore, only the peak of the daily balances which should have been adopted by the AO as the assessee s income and brought to tax. After considering the aforesaid submission in the Ld. CIT(A) directed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version