Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

BALAJI YARNS AND 3 Versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND 2

Remedy of appeal under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act - Held that:- It is trite principal to be followed stead-fast in commercial matters that rather than straightway invoking the jurisdiction of the high court under Article 226 of the of the Constitution, an aggrieved party avails and exhausts the alternative remedy. The aforesaid principle unequivocally stem from the decisions of the apex court and of this court referred to hereinabove. - In the aforesaid circumstances, the Court is not in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re the Tribunal in the appeal which they may now file. - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18846 of 2016 - Dated:- 16-11-2016 - MR. N.V.ANJARIA, J. FOR THE PETITIONER : MR. BK. RAJ, ADVOCATE CAV ORDER Heard learned advocate Mr. B. K. Raj for the petitioners. 2 What is brought under challenge by filling this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, is the order dated 28.09.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Surat, being order under section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

espondent bank invoking provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, issued notice dated 18.06.2015 under section 13(2) of the Act. Thereafter, notice under section 13(4) of the Act was also issued on 29.04.2016. As the petitioners failed to deliver the possession of the mortgaged property, an application dated 20.07.2016 was made under section 14 of the Act to the District Magistrate seeking his assistance in taking poss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ers, reported in (2014)6 SCC 1. In support of various contentions raised, learned advocate for the petitioner relied on Harshad Govardhan Sondagar (supra). He also relied on another decision in J. Rajiv Subramaniyan and Another vs. Pandiyas and Others [(2014) 5 SCC 651]. He relied yet on another decision in Mathew Varghese vs. M. Amritha Kumar and Others [(2014) 5 SCC 610]. 5. As the facts noted and highlighted above, the order impugned is the order passed by the District Magistrate in exercise .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

respect of measures taken post-13(4) stage. In the present case, the stage at which the petitioner is beset with, is such stage. The petitioner is aggrieved person for the purpose of Section 17 of the Act. 5.1 Thus the petitioner has remedy of preferring an appeal under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. In Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev Vs State of Maharashtra [(2011) 2 SCC 782], the Apex Court in paragraphs Nos. 21 and 22 has observed as under, 21. In Indian Overse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ers and to prevent prejudice being caused to a borrower on account of an error on the part of the banks or financial institutions, certain checks and balances have been introduced in Section 17 which allow any person, including the borrower, aggrieved by any of the measures referred to in sub-section (4) of Section 13 taken by the secured creditor, to make an application to the DRT having jurisdiction in the matter within 45 days from the date of such measures having taken for the reliefs indica .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ansferee. 39. We are unable to agree with or accept the submissions made on behalf of the appellants that the DRT had no jurisdiction to interfere with the action taken by the secured creditor after the stage contemplated under Section 13(4) of the Act. On the other hand, the law is otherwise and it contemplates that the action taken by a secured creditor in terms of Section 13(4) is open to scrutiny and cannot only be set aside but even the status quo ante can be restored by the DRT." (Emp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ermore, the supreme court in United Bank of India V/s Satyawati Tondon and Others, reported in AIR 2010 SC 3413, as sounded a caution for readily entertaining the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by the High Courts against the orders and at the stages when the remedy is available to the aggrieved party under section 17 of the Act. In paragraph No.17 of the Satyawati Tondon (supra), the Apex Court stated and held, 17. There is another reason why the impugned order should be set asid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pass interim orders under Sections 17 and 18 and are required to decide the matters within a fixed time schedule. It is thus evident that the remedies available to an aggrieved person under the SARFAESI Act are both expeditious and effective. Unfortunately, the High Court overlooked the settled law that the High Court will ordinarily not entertain a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution if an effective remedy is available to the aggrieved person and that this rule applies with greater .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s but also envisage constitution of quasi-judicial bodies for redressal of the grievance of any aggrieved person. Therefore, in all such cases, High Court must insist that before availing remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution, a person must exhaust the remedies available under the relevant statute. 5.3 The remedy of section 17 of the Act is available at such stage and position which is obtained in the present case as well. In this regard, yet another decision of division bench this court .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

02. The record reveals that on 18th January, 2011, the Division Bench of this Court passed the following order:- "2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on interim relief since it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be dispossessed anytime pursuant to the impugned order. 3. It appears that it is not the case of the petitioner that the loan is not taken or the amount is not recoverable. It further appears from the order of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ecution of the order of the Ld. Magistrate under section 14 of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, on condition that the petitioner deposits the amount of ₹ 3,50,32,281/- [Rupees three crore fifty lac thirty two thousand two hundred eighty one only] with the respondent- bank within a period of one week from today. 5. It is also observed and clarified that if there is failure to comply with the condition to deposit the am .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r shall also not transfer or alienate the property in question. " 5. We would like to rely upon the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Analkumar Rajkishore Mishra & ors. Vs. Dena Bank, reported in AIR 2011 Gujarat, 187 (to which one of us, J.B. Pardiwala, J. is a party) on the question of alternative remedy. The observations made in paragraph 9 are as under:- "9. From the aforesaid provisions of law, it will be evident that the notice for possessio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ew that it was not open to the Debt Recovery Tribunal to reject the appeal u/Sec.17 of the Act on the ground that it was premature or not maintainable." 5.4. The division bench of this court in Sonali Sunil Bhanushali vs. Authorised Officer HDFC Bank being LPA No. 395 of 2016 decided on 6.5.2016 after surveying the several decisions including the above referred decisions, has upheld the view that the aggrieved party has to first avail the remedy of appeal under section 17 of the Act by goin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version